Scoring Chances: CBJ @ BOS 11/17/11
In such a low scoring game, it's not a huge surprise that neither side generated many quality scoring chances.
What is a bit of a surprise is just how few occured - both teams did an excellent job of preventing their opponents from driving in and establishing themselves in the high percentage areas, and it really took until the 4 on 4 in the OT to loosen things up.
Does it make leaving a point on the table in the SO any easier to take? No, but at least it lets us recognize that both teams played a hell of a game.
Best E/S Forward: Vinny Prospal (+3)
Worst E/S Forward: R.J. Umberger (-5)
Best E/S D-man: Grant Clitsome (0)
Worst E/S D-man: Nikita Nikitin (-3)
Scoring Chances for NHL Game Number 20260
Team | Period | Time | Note | CBJ | Opponent | |||||||||||
BOS | 1 | 17:10 | Kelly | 5 | 6 | 16 | 24 | 30 | 40 | 14 | 23 | 40 | 44 | 49 | 67 | 5v5 |
BOS | 1 | 10:48 | Peverley | 6 | 16 | 24 | 30 | 40 | 51 | 14 | 23 | 40 | 44 | 49 | 67 | 5v5 |
CBJ | 2 | 17:11 | Mackenzie - GOAL | 6 | 14 | 22 | 24 | 30 | 40 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 44 | 63 | 5v4 | |
BOS | 2 | 15:36 | McQuaid - GOAL | 5 | 7 | 14 | 18 | 30 | 61 | 23 | 33 | 40 | 49 | 54 | 67 | 5v5 |
CBJ | 2 | 11:17 | Nash | 3 | 7 | 18 | 21 | 30 | 61 | 23 | 33 | 40 | 49 | 54 | 67 | 5v5 |
BOS | 2 | 10:40 | Marchand | 3 | 7 | 18 | 21 | 30 | 61 | 17 | 18 | 33 | 40 | 46 | 54 | 5v5 |
BOS | 2 | 9:08 | Bergeron | 6 | 7 | 18 | 30 | 51 | 61 | 19 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 54 | 63 | 5v5 |
CBJ | 2 | 7:14 | Mackenzie | 3 | 21 | 22 | 24 | 30 | 50 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 40 | 47 | 49 | 5v5 |
CBJ | 2 | 5:21 | Letestu | 5 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 22 | 30 | 21 | 23 | 40 | 47 | 49 | 67 | 5v5 |
CBJ | 2 | 0:51 | Vermette | 3 | 15 | 21 | 26 | 30 | 50 | 14 | 23 | 40 | 44 | 49 | 67 | 5v5 |
CBJ | 2 | 0:44 | Letestu | 6 | 17 | 22 | 30 | 40 | 51 | 19 | 21 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 63 | 5v5 |
CBJ | 3 | 17:21 | Umberger | 7 | 18 | 21 | 30 | 51 | 61 | 11 | 20 | 33 | 40 | 44 | 5v4 | |
BOS | 3 | 14:19 | Seguin | 6 | 15 | 26 | 30 | 50 | 51 | 14 | 19 | 37 | 40 | 44 | 63 | 5v5 |
BOS | 3 | 1:43 | Seguin | 7 | 18 | 21 | 30 | 51 | 61 | 19 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 44 | 63 | 5v5 |
BOS | 3 | 0:28 | Peverley | 3 | 7 | 18 | 21 | 30 | 61 | 23 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 44 | 49 | 5v5 |
CBJ | 4 | 4:26 | Carter | 6 | 7 | 30 | 51 | 61 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 49 | 54 | 4v4 | ||
BOS | 4 | 4:20 | Peverley | 6 | 7 | 30 | 51 | 61 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 49 | 54 | 4v4 | ||
BOS | 4 | 4:12 | Kelley | 3 | 18 | 21 | 26 | 30 | 23 | 33 | 40 | 47 | 49 | 4v4 | ||
BOS | 4 | 3:55 | Marchand | 3 | 21 | 26 | 30 | 50 | 11 | 21 | 40 | 47 | 63 | 4v4 | ||
BOS | 4 | 2:33 | Seguin | 3 | 15 | 24 | 30 | 19 | 33 | 40 | 46 | 63 | 3v4 | |||
CBJ | 4 | 1:31 | Nash | 21 | 26 | 30 | 51 | 61 | 14 | 23 | 40 | 44 | 49 | 4v4 | ||
CBJ | 4 | 0:28 | Carter | 7 | 18 | 21 | 30 | 61 | 33 | 37 | 40 | 44 | 4v3 |
# | Player | EV | PP | SH | ||||||
3 | M. METHOT | 24:29 | 3 | 4 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 2:06 | 0 | 1 |
5 | A. JOHNSON | 9:04 | 1 | 2 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
6 | N. NIKITIN | 20:51 | 2 | 5 | 1:37 | 1 | 0 | 0:54 | 0 | 0 |
7 | J. CARTER | 17:59 | 2 | 6 | 2:41 | 2 | 0 | 0:16 | 0 | 0 |
14 | G. CLITSOME | 9:38 | 1 | 1 | 1:28 | 1 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
15 | D. DORSETT | 13:47 | 1 | 1 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 1:38 | 0 | 1 |
16 | D. BRASSARD | 8:53 | 0 | 2 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
17 | M. LETESTU | 15:27 | 2 | 0 | 1:55 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
18 | R. UMBERGER | 16:32 | 1 | 6 | 2:41 | 2 | 0 | 1:39 | 0 | 0 |
19 | R. JOHANSEN | 13:12 | 1 | 0 | 1:55 | 0 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
21 | J. WISNIEWSKI | 25:05 | 4 | 5 | 3:23 | 2 | 0 | 1:06 | 0 | 0 |
22 | V. PROSPAL | 16:48 | 3 | 0 | 2:10 | 1 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
24 | D. MACKENZIE | 7:48 | 1 | 2 | 0:15 | 1 | 0 | 1:38 | 0 | 1 |
26 | S. PAHLSSON | 14:59 | 2 | 3 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 2:06 | 0 | 0 |
30 | C. SANFORD | 55:58 | 7 | 11 | 4:51 | 3 | 0 | 4:00 | 0 | 1 |
40 | J. BOLL | 8:10 | 1 | 2 | 0:15 | 1 | 0 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 |
50 | A. VERMETTE | 16:01 | 2 | 2 | 0:00 | 0 | 0 | 0:27 | 0 | 0 |
51 | F. TYUTIN | 22:58 | 3 | 5 | 2:22 | 1 | 0 | 1:54 | 0 | 0 |
61 | R. NASH | 17:07 | 3 | 6 | 2:41 | 2 | 0 | 0:16 | 0 | 0 |
Something interesting in the TOI: Despite going an extra 5 minutes, this is probably the most "balanced" usage of his forwards we've seen from Scott Arniel lately.
Period | Totals | EV | PP | 5v3 PP | SH | 5v3 SH | ||||||
1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Totals | 10 | 12 | 7 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Head To Head:
Not a great head to head matchup for the top line in general, but it's worth pointing out that neither team allowed their opponents' top lines a lot of opportunities. In a different game, I wonder if we might have seen them break out a bit more - and let's also be honest, Nash and Carter both missing on potential GWGs in OT means this might have been a very different report had they connected.