Trading Rick Nash
Well, it's all on the table now.
Bob McKenzie of TSN puts it best:
While it's easy, and sometime necessary, to get hung on precise terminology on a story like this one -- the differences between "on the market" as opposed to "listening to offers" as opposed to "being shopped" -- here's the bottom line:
Last week, in no uncertain terms, NHL teams were told Nash was not available and this week, he is. For the right team, anyway.
Less than two weeks to the NHL trade deadline, that is nothing less than a seismic shift.
That doesn't mean he'll necessarily be traded by the deadline but it does mean there has been a significant change in his status from last week to this week.
Nash's simple response, as reported by Aaron Portzline:
I'm a Blue Jacket right now. I've played my whole career here and it's a special place to me. So as of right now I'm a Blue Jacket.
Last night, Puck Daddy Greg Wyshynski threw out some teams that would have interest in Nash. The New York Rangers continue to be at the top of the buzz chart, and they do make sense on more than one level. Wyshynski also mentions the Washington Capitals have a lot of young talent with cap room to spare. Two teams that have been speculated, but no official reports are the Los Angeles Kings and Vancouver Canucks.
When you trade a player like Nash, you want the minimize the number of times you'll have to potentially face him each year. To say he would be motivated when playing against the Jackets would be an understatement. That said, the Jackets may still be hoping on the new divisional alignment to eventually shake out, thus they would have less of a fear for trading him to a team in the West.
Of all the teams, New York makes the most sense based on what has taken place so far. There have clearly been talks between Blue Jackets GM Scott Howson and NYR GM Glen Sather. Whether the talks are for Nash, or for departing center Jeff Carter as originally reported, only time will tell.
The Rangers lead the East, and with 3 fewer games played than the Red Wings - the only team with more points than the blue shirts - they're clearly making a case that this is their year. With players like Marian Gaborik, Brad Richards, Ryan Callahan, Marc Staal and world class goalie Henrik Lundqvist, adding Rick Nash to that mix would far and away make them the most dangerous team in the league.
There's really no way talks continue without Brandon Dubinsky coming in return, a player the Blue Jackets have coveted for years. What else could be of value to the Jackets is the question. Picks, prospects... perhaps.
But when looking at the Blue Jackets biggest needs - a true number one goalie and a top 4 defenseman, two other teams seem to have more to offer.
The Jackets will be replacing Steve Mason. The free agent market is thin on goalies this off-season, and even if they have their eye on a player, the chance of signing them without grossly overpaying is slim. Remember the Mike Commodore and Kristian Huselius contracts?
So it makes the most sense to find a goalie by trade, and who would command a better return than Rick Nash? Of teams rumored to have interest in Nash, the Kings could offer Jonathan Bernier and the Canucks could pick their future with Roberto Luongo or Cory Schneider. Both teams also have some defensemen that would interest the Jackets and could certainly include a pick or prospect as both teams have their eyes on the Stanley Cup.
These would all appear to be teams Rick Nash would sign off on, considering he has a No Movement Clause in his contract for another four years, but again, only time will tell.
This may all be for naught, as even with the poor play and rampant rumors, Nash will stand behind his organization and trust their judgement. He may very well be a Blue Jacket next year and beyond.
But for the first time, he's listening.
165 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Picks
From a team like the Rangers, picks are worthless. They will most likely be at the bottom of each round, so a 1st is really a 2nd, a 2nd a 3rd, etc. I also assume a team like the Rangers would be sending us a giant albatross contract back (Christian Backman, anyone?) to make a deal like this work. Thanks, but no thanks.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
no the most rumored trade was
Dubinsky, 1st pick (23rd ish overall), and Kreider
but nobody on the Rangers wants to do that. Besides we are more interested in Carter than Nash. We do not want to take your franchise player away from you guys especially with a cap hit like his.
For Nash? That deal would make me throw up in my mouth.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Dubi isn’t coming back because we “covet” him, it’d be for salary cap reasons, although he is a top 6 forward. It’s not like he’s a replacement for Nash or guy to build around. The Rangers have a ton of young talent, especially on the back end we could.
a 1st, Krieder, Dubi, Hagelin, then one of either McDonough or Del Zotto. They can have Nash and “40 point” Grant Clitsome.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 2:29 PM EST up reply actions
Howson has wanted Dubinsky since he traded Zherdev and Fritsche for Tyutin and Backman. That’s the definition of coveting. Maybe you don’t think so, but Howson’s been after him for a long time.
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
If they trade Nash...
…and don’t get a stud goalie prospect or stud defense prospect in return, it will be an epic failure in my book.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
I agree, although maybe not quite as strongly.
Trading Nash is definitely the best chance to get a REAL goalie.
A deal centered around Carter for Dubinsky could make more sense anyway.
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
True, I know he liked and wants dubinsky, but that’s not the driving force behind a Nash deal, the cap hit is. The key piece is Krieder and whatever defenseman we can get
The more the kings scoring woes continue I think the more likely it is we get bernier in a deal for Carter. Doesn’t have to be in a Nash deal.
If we deal Nash, RJ and Tyutin have to go as well. Hoping a floor team like the isles would take Tyutin
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
Also, NYR s late 1st round pick could net us Malcolm Subban. Brother of PK, top goalie prospect
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, but thats no guarantee and he probably wont be ready for another 5 years.
Maybe Subban will fall to second round and we can snatch him up with that first pick.
I know. It might be nice to get a talented goalie developing in our system. If you read my posts I’m guessing Carter goes to LA for Bernier but obviously we do move for one. But we need better than Allen York on the farm
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
I should clarify
I’m talking guys that are ready to break into the NHL, not guys five years down the road. In my mind, there’s no way you trade Nash to do anything other than bring in LEGIT rebuilding pieces, especially on D and/or in goal.
Dubinsky and a late 1st round pick aren’t those pieces, IMHO.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Also, Allen York isn’t a horrible prospect. He just needs three years in the AHL first. He shouldn’t be anywhere near the NHL roster right now.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
He is being completely mismanaged this year. This year has been horrible for his development.
I would be fine with not getting a solid young goalie out of the Nash deal as long as we do with the Carter deal. If we get that goalie with Carter, I would shoot for solid defense and more offense with Nash.
Um, but Kreider is a guy that could be in the NHL next year (he’s 20) and is playing college hockey right now.
The Rangers have a glut of young d men already playing at a high level in the NHL (McDonough is 22, del Zotto is 21) … They have Girardi and Staal locked up plus Sauer, out with a concussion, but he’s also just 24 and was playing very well.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
He's not a D/G, though
IMHO, that’s what we need most (see my comment above).
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
If we trade Carter and Nash, we are certainly going to need top forward talent. Especially considering a Nash move also means Vermette and RJ on the way out
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 4:06 PM EST up reply actions
Truth
I’ve been talking about this in a vacuum, I guess. The problem to me is that a lot of those guys will only get picks back, and Nash is the one chance to really get solid, high-level-prospect players. I would rather get a top-shelf D/G (especially with Nail most likely coming in) from Nash, and I just can’t see NYR giving one up.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
I hear ya. But Krieder Is as high level a prospect as there is.
1st round pick, tore it up at world juniors, playing very well at BC, good size
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 4:29 PM EST up reply actions
It’s not that I don’t like him… I just figure if we’re going to rebuild, we should rebuild from the back-end out this time.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Um, I think it’s safe to forget about @dexshow
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 4:09 PM EST up reply actions
He would have to take a very club-friendly deal for me to want to re-sign him after this year. Dude’s legs are apparently made of glass.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
a 1st, Krieder, Dubi, Hagelin, then one of either McDonough or Del Zotto.
Yeah, that’s never happening.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 4:01 PM EST up reply actions
Should we be asking for Steve skinner and jeff woywitka?
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 4:08 PM EST up reply actions
Not at all, but you’re not getting arguably our best prospect, arguably our best defenseman, plus two good roster players and a 1st rounder.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 5:50 PM EST up reply actions
Seems fair for Nash.
Del Zotto, McDonough, anisimov, Sauer, step an,, and Hagelin all RFA in next year or two. If you trade for Nash, can’t afford to keep them all anyway with deals in place for richards,Callahan, gaborik, Hank, girardi, Staal…I mean Stepan alone will command a huge raise
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 6:00 PM EST up reply actions
Seems fair for Nash.
I don’t share your love of him. He’s a 70 point guy paid like a 90 point one, Plus the cap impact is a big reason why Howson is unlikely to get anything like that package back.
While it is Eklund-based, the Kings package below is much closer to the value you can expect. You’re not getting 5 solid pieces for Nash.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 6:05 PM EST up reply actions
No, the Eklund package is a joke. Mike Richards netting a better prospect than Kreider, a talented young roster player, and a pick. Nash is a lot better and more valuable than Richards.
Not asking you to share my love of him, but Nash is worth a lot more than just Brandon dubisnky, a pick, and prospect. Prospect and pick is what it costs for garbage like Kaberle and Penner
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 6:11 PM EST up reply actions
Nash is a lot better and more valuable than Richards.
You lose me there. More valuable certainly, but Richards is every bit as capable of putting up points. I understand the “he’s never played with elite talent” argument, and the counter is Gaborik, who certainly never played with better talent in Minnesota, and was more productive there. That production didn’t suddenly skyrocket with Richards, he’s the same guy.
Also:
Dubinsky = Simmonds & Pick = Pick. The difference between Kreider/Schenn and Nash/Richards is not Hagelin + McDonagh.
I get that he is the face and has value, I’m just giving you the Rangers side as I perceive it, and there’s just no chance Sather is giving you all that. I’d be surprised if he even pays the Dubi + Kreider + 1st price.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 6:33 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I would be surprised too, which is why I say no way Rangers get him.
by cbjfan14 on Feb 14, 2012 7:43 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
I don’t think the Rangers get him either, but there’s the other thing.
Nash’s NMC puts a serious damper on the bidding war also. So there’s little incentive for an opposing GM to pay out the behind for Nash’s service, because he’s bidding against (mostly) himself.
I don’t think Nash moves at all, simply because IMO there’s no way Howson can get adequate value back. But if he does move, I sense reading through here that you guys are going to be somewhat disappointed in the return.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 11:37 PM EST up reply actions
If the Rangers, Flyers, and Capitals are on his list (as it appears to be), that’s three eastern conference powerhouses bidding against each other.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 11:41 PM EST up reply actions
Well, Caps are far from a powerhouse this year, and might even be sellers.
For all we laugh at Sather’s UFA signings, rarely does he overpay in the trade market. If the Flyers want to overpay, god bless them. I really just don’t see it bringing back anything close to what you guys want, which I will add would be a shame.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 11:45 PM EST up reply actions
Caps will be buyers, hell they are in on Nash apparently. They are still expected to win in that market.
Don’t forget, they are missing their 2 big money guys right now – Backstrom and Green.
IF Green and Backstrom comeback, even as an 8 seed, with Vokoun in net, they probably aren’t an easy out.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 11:52 PM EST up reply actions
Caps arent in on Nash. Dont believe all those trade rumors you hear. They cant afford him.
I would bet they are in on Vermette or Umby though. And based on the Leonsis blog today, they will be looking at buying. They cant afford much though.
The teams the jackets are heavily scouting are the Caps, Flyers, and Rangers – that lends itself to the idea Nash probably has those 3 on his list.
Caps could move Semin and then could easily afford Nash.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 12:08 AM EST up reply actions
Evgeny Kuznetsov, John Carlson, Karl Alzner, Marcus Johanssan, plenty of young talent the Caps have that would interest the Jackets I think…
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 12:10 AM EST up reply actions
Just trust me, the Caps wont be going after Nash. Possibly (and i stress poissibly) Carter, but not Nash. They need centers
Besides, they arent going to break up Carlson and Alzner who are best friends, roommates, and have been playing together forever and we arent going to want Kuznetsov who is 50/50 as to whether he actually comes to the NHL or not. And with a trade to the Jackets, no way he comes here.
The Caps won’t trade Carlson. The Rangers won’t trade Kreider.
There was a time when the Kings wouldn’t trade Schenn and the Flames wouldn’t trade Phaneuf. There was a time when trading Carter and Richards was unthinkable.
Nash is a superstar winger, it’s gonna require major value in return. The Capitals are in a freefall, they aren’t going to let Alzer and Carlson being BFFs stand in their way of making a huge move that could get them back on track if one presents itself
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 12:21 AM EST up reply actions
My point with them being friends, roommates, and teammates forever was that they have grown a great chemistry together.
No, the Caps wont trade Carlson. Not when they need defense. Hamrlik is all but done. Schultz is forever in the doghouse. Green is made of whatever Dipietro is made of, Erskine wont be around much longer. Carlson and Alzner is what they will build around for the future.
They dont need to take on a 7 million dollar contract for six years to get them back on track just for this season.
And Orlov, cant forget Orlov. Caps will build around Kuznetsov, Ovechkin, Backstrom at forward, Green, Carlson, Alzner, Orlov at defense and Neuvirth, Holtby in goal. Good start, No reason to take on the Nash contract, thats for sure.
I find it ironic that people are still saying so and so “won’t” be traded in a RICK NASH TRADE thread. A guy who certainly would never be traded.
Not saying any of the deals or players I talk about will happen – who knows at this point. But anyone can be moved especially when a superstar is involved
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 1:04 AM EST up reply actions
There was a time when the Kings wouldn’t trade Schenn
Never was untouchable, just valuable. Lombardi said he would only be willing to trade Schenn if there was a marquee player coming back. He swapped a future 2nd line center for an already developed 2nd line center.
I think the point is that prized young players aren’t moved if it immediately creates another need. The Caps need Carlson, he’s in the present and future top pair.
Dinglebarnin' It JftC
Its possible. Im not sure which comments your using for your guess that we are “going to be somewhat disappointed in the return”, so its hard to comment on that.
I mean I am in no way expecting “1st, Krieder, Dubi, Hagelin, then one of either McDonough or Del Zotto” or anything like that. But I also dont expect us to deal with the Rangers. They are already the favorites and they have great chemistry with that team. NYR dont need another bloated contract this year. Some secondary scoring would help them a lot for the playoffs but I dont think they necessarily need Nash to be that guy.
I expect a young breaking out goalie, a solid young proven defensemen, a top six forward and a high pick. Possibly a little more depending on D and F that we get.That could include a Sanford also from us, it doesnt matter. I dont think thats too much to ask for for Nash. Seems reasonable for the right team.
Although there wont be as much of a bidding war with less teams, the nice thing is we are not exactly forced to trade him. He didnt ask for a trade and he would really mind staying, so we dont have to get rid of him. We can be patient with this one and wait for the right deal, which will help bring a bigger return
I expect a young breaking out goalie, a solid young proven defensemen, a top six forward and a high pick. Possibly a little more depending on D and F that we get.
Even this is likely too much.
Kovalchuk (albeit a rental), commanded a 20-goal rookie/prospect (who since flamed out, but that’s besides the point), a bottom 4-dman, a good, not great prospect, and a pick. Nash would be under team control, so that increases the price a bit, but his cap hit will limit the ceiling of that increase. The price you and Zherdev are proposing is much higher than that Kovy package.
I don’t want to keep beating the still living horse, so I’ll just leave the argument at that. I appreciate the feedback, any time there’s a big rumor like this, it’s nice to see the other perspective. Thanks.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 15, 2012 8:50 AM EST up reply actions
You really can’t compare this to Kovy. Kovalchuk was a completely different scenario. First, he is Russian so he is automatically more stubborn and especially since he basically asked to be traded. Second, the team trading for him had no certainty that he would re sign there. He wanted big money for a long term, and there wasn’t much time to get a deal done. You can’t give too much up for a player that you might now even be able to sign.
Nash is already signed and he is well liked both across the NHL and in the locker room. Teams don’t have to worry about signing him once the trade happens. So we should get more out of Nash than what Kovy got, that’s for sure
by cbjfan14 on Feb 15, 2012 10:37 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Also, he’s a 70 pt guy playing with no talent, think he’d still be a 70 point guy with brad Richards as his center? His stats would be crazy if he we’re a ranger
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 6:18 PM EST up reply actions
Dan, the question then becomes… are the Blue Jackets looking to turn things around in 1-2 years or is this the rumored 4-5 year rebuild?
Nothing suggests that even if it’s a top 10 pick the Jackets will be able to do anything with it. Let’s face it, not a single pick has yet proven to be a home run. Even Nash, with as many goals as he can score, has only been able to lead this team to the playoffs once.
If it’s a 4-5 year rebuild, I can see the team stockpiling as many picks and prospects as they can in the next 2-3 years. If they’re looking for a slightly quicker turn-around, that’s how I see a deal with the Kings or Canucks making the most sense.
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
there is no quick turnaround – they tried that this year, bringing in Cater, Wiz, Martinek, Prospal, etc. It was a disaster.
Time to get rid of the bloated contracts (Nash, Umberger, Vermette, Carter, Tyutin) for picks, prospects, and young, proven talent.
Johansen, Yakupov, Krieder, Brassard, Atkinson, Moore – with some young talent all coming up together even if it takes some time to develop and content they’d at least be fun to watch. Nash is not the centerpiece of a team.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 2:33 PM EST up reply actions
This year’s offensive disaster is a complete fluke year for most of the bloated contracts you mention. Just due to regression, these guys will never have such crappy scoring, shooting %, point total seasons again until they reach their twilight years. It’s unfortunate that the proven offensive talent all fell flat in the same year.
If you were to say that the Jackets should move bloated contracts and bring in actual defensive talent, that’s a whole different thing and I’d agree to that. This team has no goaltending and a pathetic set of defesnemen. It’s the same set of weaknesses that the team had last year.
Unfortunately, it’s going to be impossible to preserve the two most important players (Carter and Nash) while actually acquiring a goalie or defense. The Jackets won’t be able to replace two top-10 goal scorers very quickly, and it’s just annoying to watch what should have been the best offense in Jackets history just evaporate away because Scott Howson was idiotic enough to put all his trust in Steve Mason and a bunch of AHL netminders/blueliners.
CCT, CBJ, SU, NYM, Bills Fan. It can be depressing.
Sometimes I tweet things
You can’t just take a mulligan on the season and say “we’ll get em next year” with $130 million locked up on wiz, Carter, and Nash.
Nash is a stud but the team does need an overhaul.replace Nash with Kane or any other superstar, the team still blows. Bottom line, team needs defense, goaltending, and forwards – we can keep Nash and be a garbage team with a good player, or make moves to get ua enough you guys to at least be a young developing team with a bright future, even if we aren’t winning.
But yes we do need D – and the rangers have Del Zotto, Sauer, and McDonough. All young D studs. They can afford to part w one
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 3:40 PM EST up reply actions
they wouldn’t have to give us an albatross + dubinsky, they’d just have to throw in Wolski who is a pending UFA with a $3.8 million cap hit.
Wolski (3.8) – Dubi (4.2) = $8. Enough for Nash.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
They don’t even need to do that. Wolski’s done after the season, and Dubinsky would be enough to clear the cap hit for the year. It’s long term (2-3 years) that there would be issues.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 4:00 PM EST up reply actions
Unless they gave us McDonough, since once they have Nash will be very hard to give big deals to him and del Zotto, who will be Rfas looking for raises. You also have Stepan who will need a raise as well. That’s why I think one of those 2 guys is in the deal
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 4:13 PM EST up reply actions
As long as he's traded to the East
I can handle it. I’ll need a team to root for come playoff time anyway. I’m still not convinced the realignment is going to happen any time soon, or even should, and having to see him multiple times a year on another Western Conference team would just be too painful.
The one thing I guess I’m guilty of doing is forgetting about the 1st or 2nd overall pick that is all but certain to head to the Jackets this year. Because even with all the moving players, it sounds like one of this guy or this guy will be wearing the Union Blue next year. So that’s at least one top-6 offensive talent that comes in without any dealing current players.
CCT, CBJ, SU, NYM, Bills Fan. It can be depressing.
Sometimes I tweet things
Atkinson and Calvert will both be on next years roster as well
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
Hopefully Johansen will take the next step up as well. That is, as long as he gets some playing time here on out. We need to develop this kid right, not doing a great job over the last few weeks.
Seguin and Stamkos were health scratches a lot of their rookie years – Johan is a kid, he’s 19, its good to bring him along slowly. Look at Hopkins…his body couldnt hold up The NHL level at such a young age.
It can be frusterating as a fan to see him scratched, but a ton of ice for a kid doesnt mean faster development and can even be to their detriment. Johan is the future, we should ease him in
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
This is true. Despite what was said at the time, perhaps Stamkos’ “terrible” rookie year was good for him. Of course, having a guy like St. Louis to feed you beautiful passes doesn’t hurt…
CCT, CBJ, SU, NYM, Bills Fan. It can be depressing.
Sometimes I tweet things
Having a fucking seeing-eye-rocket-booster wrist shot doesn’t hurt, either.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
by Dan P. on Feb 14, 2012 5:04 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
…Stamkos missed 3 games his rookie year. Seguin missed 8.
Johansen has been a healthy scratch 4 of the last 5 games.
RNH is a year younger than Johansen with a MUCH smaller frame and we gave Johansen an extra year to develop in juniors.
Make no mistake, going into the year i certainly did not want Johansen to be playing 82 games. I knew he would be scratched for more games than Seguin, which was fine. But, the part I dont like about the scratching is the prolonged scratch. I dont like him sitting out 4 games in a row. I would prefer one every few games if he is really playing that bad. This at least gives him the chance to show himself and work on his game, while still getting the chance to watch from a different angle.
You guys are getting Yakupov next year
that is some pretty superstar talent right there, with the right moves involving Carter Nash or both you could really restructure your team and prove to be a tough opponent.
Yeah, but Taylor Hall didn’t instantly make Edmonton a great team. Counting on a #1 pick to replace a guy like Nash in terms of production is a bit short-sighted.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
This
The way i see it, Edmonton decided on a 4-5 year rebould. Now, they have Eberle, Hall, RNH, and they need one more piece, a defensemen.
However, I could see us doing this in a matter of 1-2 years because we have the assets right now to pull that off. We are already looking at adding Yakupov for next year, so lets assume we trade both Nash and Carter. Out of Nash and Carter, I would expect to definately have a top young goalie, great young defensemen, a couple of young forwards along with draft picks for the future.
With this, will already be a deep young team. Obviously, there will be some more trades in there, but that should basically be the premise of what Howson should shoot for
Not sure I agree
The Oilers are not one defenseman away by any means. Yeah, they’re giving up almost 3 a game, but it’s not like they’re scoring in bunches with all of those guys (2.62 per game).
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
They have been missing RNH a good chunk of the year. And in a year or two when they make the playoffs, Eberle, Hall, RNH, Dubnyk, etc will all be much improved through strength, experience, and maturity.
And when I say one good defensemen away, i mean one good solid young defensemen AND obviously some more added pieces. They still need to upgrade their entire team, but as for the core they just miss one solid defensemen assuming Dubnyk lives to his potential.
Deal Nash to La and Carter to NYR!
Get Nail this summer.
Get Bernier, Jack Johnson + prospects/picks from LA for Nash.
Get prospects + picks from Rangers for Carter. Not Kreider or Erixon, but take Zuccarello (will do well with top 6 miunutes), Thomas or even St. Croix (is gonna rock), maybe Valentenko on D.
Reboot with some very good young talent.
No problem. But we have a lot of great prospects, and I do not see Erixon or Kreider going in a Carter deal. Carter can be had on the cheap, and you guys could make out well with some of these young guys for a rebuild.
Dont see the Jackets risking it with Erixon, who is what i would call a "problem child’ by wanting out of Calgary for NYR.
Carter will still fetch a good return. Honestly not sure what, I think Howson is the only person that has any idea as to what Carter will bring back. We at least have an idea for Nash.
To Caps???
They could use him big time and have all the ammo in the world
by Sportzxpert on Feb 14, 2012 4:20 PM EST via Android app reply actions
Man, if the internet goes this crazy on the thought that Nash could be traded… imagine what will happen if a trade does go down?
And if Jeff Carter is yet again only the second most important trade to go down in a day?
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
Imagine the day Carter and Richards were traded, and add even more to that.
It will be nuts. All the sudden trade deadline just got a whole lot more interesting in the NHL
by cbjfan14 on Feb 14, 2012 4:59 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Why in God's name would Columbus do that?
Yes, getting Bernier would be helpful to you, but you want prospects or solid NHLers in addition to a goalie. Penner and Hunter are both terrible. Sure the Kings would love to be able to dump them, but I really can’t imagine even the BJs’ GM being taken in by a deal like that.
If you don’t get Brown or Scuderi along with Bernier you lose that deal big time. And really, your GM should be trying to pry Quick from the Kings as you already know he is a legit starter.
It’s a made up Eklund fake rumor pay it no mind
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 6:01 PM EST up reply actions
They should. Bernier is going to be the better NHL goalie in the longrun. Quick’s game is based on athleticism. Bernier’s is based on fundamentals. Goalies like Quick break down faster.
Not to mention that when he goes UFA next summer, Quick is probably going to demand $8 million+ per year, and the Kings are unlikely to be able to afford that.
well in that case, jackets should dump saleries and offer quick the moon
hes got that crappy offensive team competitive, why cant he do the same here?
I imagine there are a few teams who will be making him offers if the Kings can’t resign him and don’t trade him before next summer. The thing is that LA has plenty of goaltending depth in their system with Bernier, Jones, Zatkoff, Berube, and Campbell all in line. They can afford to move any of them, Quick included.
i mean, im not crazy when i say quick could be the best goalie in the league right now?
deff. top 3, at worst top 5
It would be interesting to see him play behind a team that is not as defensively sound as Los Angeles. There is probably not a better top-6 defensemen in the NHL than Doughty, Mitchell, Scuderi, Johnson, Greene, Martinez. The Kings are so good on defense that Thomas Hickey, a 4th overall pick in 2007, still languishes in the AHL with Slava Voynov who shone brilliantly in a stint with the Kings this season.
Yes, Jonathan Quick is a very good goalie and he makes a lot of spectacular saves, but he’s also perhaps the worst puck-handling goalie in the league and does have the benefit of playing in a strictly defense-first system with one of the best six-man defensive units in the NHL.
i think we could send carter to the kings for better value
they gotta be salvating over reuniting carter and richards. rick nash still wants to be here, carter dosnt
What would you guys think of the following trade with LA:
Carter – Sanford – Tyutin
Bernier-Penner-Voynov-Martinez
Sanford goes along to provide LA with a backup for the remainder of the season/playoffs, aliviating the loss of Bernier. Get two solid young defensemen in return, Tyutin goes along, where he will do a lot better on a lower pair given the teams depth at the blue line. Penner has to come to make the money work, and keep the Kings under the cap. I’d really like to unload Tyutin, he’s going up to $4.5 million next season, and he’s just not a $4.5 million player.
I do agree with the Carter-Sanford part of the deal and I agree that Tyuts is probably overpaid, but I would hate to trade our most consistent defenseman when we are already so weak on D. I would rather trade a guy like Umberger than Tyutin and I also think that Tyutin helps a guy like Nikitin a lot which is not unimportant. If we trade D for D it has to be a Russel-Nikitin type deal and I don’t see us getting lucky like that again. Typically speaking I think it’s better not to trade one position for the same position, but it can certainly be done. I do think that LA is a good trade partner, because I really like Bernier and they have a lot of other pieces that can be thrown into a deal.
Tyutin is an abomination. I’d trade him for a conditional 7th round pick. the only thing he is consistent at is turnovers and poor d zone coverage
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 10:40 PM EST up reply actions
but also, Tyutin’s lack of accountability, frequent mistakes, and lackadaisical attitude are poisonous to our team and our locker room.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 11:38 PM EST up reply actions
His mistakes do frustrate me, but I am not sure where you get “lackadaisical attitude” and “poisonous to our team and our locker room from”. For instance, he and Nikitin have made each other better. I think he has helped our locker room.
Hes a solid defensemen. Had some brain farts, but overall solid. He is overpayed, but if he can help Nikitin become a solid top 4 defensemen it will be worth it.
I think he and Nikitin get along just because of the “Russian” factor. It’d be the same if we were playing hockey in Europe, if you were paired with another American it would be welcome. Communicating in a second language all the time is tough. …that’s one of the reasons I’d like to pry Voynov away from the Kings in a potential trade. That kid is going to be good, and I’d like to see him and Nikki 6 paired together, playing together, developing chemistry and their games.
agreed – would love to get Voynov in a deal.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 12:24 AM EST up reply actions
Voynov is going to be a hell of a player. I wouldnt be against getting Voynov in a deal.
Its obviouslt the Russian factor, but I think the leadership and experience Tyutin has will help our defense and Nikitin now. To say he has a lackadaisical attitude and poisonous to our locker room is innaccurate. Who knows if the styles would mesh. But we do know for a fact that the Tyutin- Nikitin duo does mesh. So ride that for now, if we get Voynov in a deal, sweet. He can be our future D with Nikitin. Tyutin isnt going to last forever.
You guys have no idea how high the Kings are on Voynov, do you?
Unless somebody is sending Ovechkin, Stamkos, or Malkin their way, there is no way Bernier and Voynov get traded in the same deal.
remember when there was “no way” the Kings would trade Brayden Shenn?
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 3:08 AM EST up reply actions
What’s in that for the Kings?
Give up the league’s premier goalie prospect and two of the best young offensive defensemen in the game in exchange for a journeyman backup, a defenseman they don’t need, and lockerroom poison?
The Kings aren’t going to trade both Martinez and Voynov to anybody unless Shero forgets to take his crazy pills in Pittsburgh and offers them Malkin. Voynov has been better than Doughty this season.
And why would they want a new backup goalie in the deal? They have four backups in the system (Jones, Zatkoff, Berube, and Campbell) so the last thing they would need is another. If they trade Bernier (and I can almost guarantee they’re not going to) they would call up Zatkoff to play behind Quick (especially since that means he won’t be seeing any ice time the rest of the way; just look at how little Bernier has played, and he is excellent).
That trade would be robbing the Kings blind. It’s so preposterous I gotta think Eklund came up with it.
Martinez and Voynov are “two of the best young offensive defensemen in the game”? I would say two good young offensive defensemen.
I dont necessarily agree with the trade, but keep in mind we would be taking Penner, who is way overpaid and a joke.
Face reality-both Nash and Carter are WAY OVERPAID and defensive liabilities-exactly what the Rangers are NOT LOOKING FOR. Dubinsky, Sauer, Staal, Zuccarello, St Croix, and a number 1 for Nash & Columbus’s #1. is a stretch
Rangers are a hard checking, defensively aware team. Carter & Nash are not those types of players. What
is Dubinsky, a plus 14, Nash a minus 22? Lundquist will not tolerate a big, slow, non backing checking winger.
How good would Dubinsky’s +/- be with Steve Mason? (sorry guys)
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 10:13 PM EST up reply actions
you should watch Rick Nash play before making dumb comments or suggestions. he’s not a liability. he’s a star player and will demand a hefty return in a trade
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 10:43 PM EST up reply actions
I’m going to also jump on the +/- bandwagon. It’s a totally worthless stat for judging individual performance. And I’m also going to assume you’ve never watched any hockey because you seem to think Nash is a “slow, non backing checking winger.”
You’re aware this is Rick Nash we’re talking about, right?
CCT, CBJ, SU, NYM, Bills Fan. It can be depressing.
Sometimes I tweet things
Del Zotto is having an all-star season and is only 21. He’s a +27,
27 pts, 121 hits, 75 blocked shots, ands makes almost nothing.
If all you are offering is Nash , you better swap this years’s #1
and maybe next year’s for the Ranger’s #1 this year and next.as well.
why are you even posting? if Nash was the kind of player you are acting like he is, the Rangers wouldn’t be interested in him
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 10:46 PM EST up reply actions
Look, I would be a plus-player if I skated in front of Lundqvist.
There’s a reason Nash was lined up with Crosby and Iginla during the Olympics. He’s an elite talent. Under Hitchcock, he learned how to play defense.
He’s had a bad year. He is playing for the worst team in the league, after all. But if that’s all you reduce Nash to, you’re dead wrong.
I’m all for differing opinions around here, but leave the ignorance at the door.
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
by Andy Newman on Feb 14, 2012 11:08 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
I’m literally about to cry over Nash being traded. I love the guy to death. I have watched him play for us since I was in 4th grade, now I’m a freshman in college. I can’t picture this team without him….
Emotions aside, I think Vancouver would be the best bet for us if we can get Cory Schneider in return.
Ohio's premier Russian fan.
Im not even a Nash fan and it makes my stomach turns with the thought of him being traded. Hard to imagine life without Rick Nash.
I always thought he’d retire here. Especially when we signed him long term a few years ago.
Ohio's premier Russian fan.
by Heavysoviet on Feb 14, 2012 11:24 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, it’s tough.
Like you mention, getting someone like Schneider back would help. It’s also important to look at this: We really haven’t been able to do anything significant with Nash here. It might just be best for the team to get good pieces to help re-build, meanwhile allowing Nash to play for a team where he doesn’t have to carry such a heavy burden.
In all scenarios where a star player gets traded, this seems like the least painful for all involved.
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
by Andy Newman on Feb 14, 2012 11:33 PM EST up reply actions
I’m a huge Nash fan. I think it’s less about us wanting to get rid of him, more just accepting there is no way we can put enough pieces around him to be anywhere near contention in the next few years. It also makes no fiscal sense to pay Carter, Nash, and Wiz $130 million just to be star players on a team going nowhere.
Ideally, if you move Nash Carter and some others, get a wide variety of young pieces back, draft well with first round picks, we can get a more balanced team and a core that can develop together. By the time Moore, Johansen, and anyone else we get reaches their potential Nash will be 31. He deserves the chance to play for a winner and to actually have a center. Getting prospects, young players and picks for him, gives us the chance to get a core group around the same age who can come up together.
I will def love watching Nash tear it up in the playoffs and get the recognition he deserves. The fact the Ranger fans are saying they don’t want to give up Krieder for him shows just how unknown his talent is around the league.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 11:36 PM EST up reply actions
The fact the Ranger fans are saying they don’t want to give up Kreider for him shows just how unknown his talent is around the league.
Nah, it’s because they’re overvaluing Kreider because they haven’t had a borderline-elite level offensive prospect come through in however long. Nobody doubts Nash’s talent (save for certain posters above who shall remain nameless), it’s his contract that is a big, big thorn in the case for trading for him.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 14, 2012 11:40 PM EST up reply actions
Derek Stepan is pretty elite…what is he, 21?
Gaborik is 30, Richards is 32, Hank is 30 – Kreider could be 3-5 years away from being a true impact player. Seems when you got a team with this many guys, including perhaps the best goalie in the world, I think it makes sense for them. Though I can see why fans are attached to some of the young guys on that team.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 14, 2012 11:49 PM EST up reply actions
Kreider’s got 80pt potential, Stepan taps out at like 65 I think. Splitting hairs I suppose, but Stepan didn’t have near the hype of this kid.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
"Oh, that sensible and sober* Rangers fan guy who is cool, actually" - Dominik, Lighthouse Hockey
*Statement has not been verified nor regressed
by George E. Ays on Feb 15, 2012 8:51 AM EST up reply actions
I will even cheer for him on teams I hate if he makes it there. I love him.
Ohio's premier Russian fan.
by Heavysoviet on Feb 14, 2012 11:41 PM EST up reply actions
As somebody not originally from Ohio and somebody late to hockey, I found it hard to pick a team to follow. I got interested via college hockey and the obsession that my friends seemed to have with the trade deadline and NHL playoffs (or that’s what it seemed to boil down to at the time). So with Syracuse as the farm team and Grant Clitsome as the best d-man on Clarkson’s team, I figured I could give the Jackets a shot. But that’s not what got me to stay. It’s Rick Nash.
When Nash is having a good game, it’s unreal. He’s a dominating physical talent, so deceptively fast and with a deadly wrist shot. I mean, we all know that stuff, but it’s so satisfying. Just that one isolated player is enough to get somebody from Upstate NY to pay attention when they finally watch the Jackets. From a gut fan reaction, it’s so hard to think that a major part of the franchise could be gone.
I know people have asked the question “Can you imagine the Jackets without Nash?” It’s a silly one for this situation (something valuable will come back), but it’s a remarkable thought experiment. Can you envision the Jackets without Nash? Yes, there were a few years without him at the outset, but Nash has helped to define the very image of the Jackets. He’s easily the first guy that comes to mind when I think of the team, and I’m a fan of the team. Who replaces him as the image of the team? Who is the next captain?
The logical side of me understands that this will probably be a good move as long as the return is right. But the illogical fan side of me is disgusted. Rick Nash is just so awesome.
CCT, CBJ, SU, NYM, Bills Fan. It can be depressing.
Sometimes I tweet things
I agree. For me, it’s just going to be so odd, watching the team, going to games, even my paraphanalia. My jersey’s are both Nash, I have a CBJ coffee mugh with the team logo and #61 on it. I have an autographed poster, you guessed it, Rick Nash. Not only is he a great hockey player, he wanted to sign a long term contract here. He wants to be in Columbus, and he wants to win here. From all accounts, he’s a great guy. In the few times I’ve met him personally, he’s been humble, down-to-earth, and extremely polite. He’s a great face for the franchise.
I hope, if they do trade him, they can let him play one last game in Columbus. It would be unprecedented, and highly unlikely, but I would DEFINITELY buy tickets to that game. Come to think of it, it just may turn into a sellout.
The oddity is, that almost no other player, no other superstar is expected to carry an entire team on his back the way Nash is. You don’t acquire one superstar and throw role players around him, with bad goaltending, and expect to win. Nash never got a fair shake here, and never got to play on a team where he wasn’t the lone superstar. Carter is good, yes, but he’s not on the same level as Nash.
I mostly agree. I only slightly disagree about Carter… he could be a top 15-20 player in the league. The problem is he’s a product of his environment. He plays better when those around him play better. He’s not Jarome Iginla or even Nash that can make linemates better.
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
by Andy Newman on Feb 15, 2012 12:24 AM EST up reply actions
I should slightly amend: Carter could be a top 15-20 player in the league if he wanted to be one.
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
by Andy Newman on Feb 15, 2012 12:25 AM EST up reply actions
I would agree with you there. His skill set is hard to ignore, he’s just so good. He’s been playing well lately, but I just don’t think he’s at Nash’s level. Just like Nash is great, but he’s not at the very top tier of superstars, Stamkos, Malkin, etc.
I always compared Rick Nash to Shane Doan. That dude has practically carried hockey in the desert by himself.
Ohio's premier Russian fan.
And that Ray Whitney guy. He helps with 51 points on the season.
Remember when we didnt want him because he was too old and wouldnt last another couple of years? Ya, he would have really helped this team in every front. Great PP player. And yes, im still very bitter at not keeping Whitney. My first real “favorite player”
I loved Whitney. The first real star player this franchise landed.
Ohio's premier Russian fan.
by Heavysoviet on Feb 15, 2012 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
True
But Whitney’s only been there a short while. Doan has carried that franchise for a long, long time.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
I was replying to cbjfan14. :-)
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
LOL. I got really confused there.
Ohio's premier Russian fan.
by Heavysoviet on Feb 15, 2012 10:37 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
We may be getting worked up over nothing. Nash and his long term contract will be difficult to move, getting the appropriate assets in return, from a team that he will want to waive his NTC to play for. He could still wind up back in Columbus next year.
My biggest fear, is the whole Howson situation. If ownership sat down with him and Priest, gave him a vote of confidence, allowed him to put together a rebuilding plan with Patricks help, and the green light to implement it, he’s got to realize that his job is in jeopardy if he fails to deliver. I am very afraid that he will feel the pressure to trade Nash, and will end up letting him go in a bad deal, not getting enough in return. Moves need to be made in the scouting department, and player development. The organization simply cannot afford to make poor draft choices. We could trade Nash for a goaltender and three first round picks, but it doesn’t do us a bit of good if we pick up another Filatov and Brule, and then take a hot young prospect, like Johanson, and send him to the press box.
I don’t think I could ever stop rooting for the team…but if the organization continues to run this team into the ground, I just don’t know how much more I can take.
no way … Nash is gone soon. Nash isn’t a guy you tangle or fool around with. If they seriously got a list from him, and are actively talking to those teams, it’s past the point of him staying.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 1:43 AM EST up reply actions
I know, but there is a difference between “dangle” or “shop” and merely available to the right team.
There’s also some politicking that has to happen. You can’t have Nash hearing his name in trade rumors when he has a NMC. You have to go to him first. For all we know, Howson could have said, “Look, Rick, we’re going to simply see what’s out there for you, and if the right deal comes along and you want to go, we’ll consider it.” It doesn’t mean they’ve actually told him, “Look, we’re trading you, so get on board.”
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Yep.
And if nothing else, all the sudden you have New York, LA, Vancouver wondering what San Jose, Philadelphia, or another team might be offering.
On both sides, this has been handled about as well as it possibly can be.
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
by Andy Newman on Feb 15, 2012 12:57 PM EST up reply actions
i dont understand the logic
if ur gonna rebuild and blow it all up, why would u resign prospel? he was our easiest trade piece
Me either. The you have a reporter…was it Portzline? I forget already, but I ran across the quote. Nash is asked if he would entertain waiving his NTC hypothetically, and the guy says, “I love Columbus. I love being here. I love being a Blue Jacket. The city of Columbus deserves a winner and deserves a good product on the ice. If it comes to that — like you said, all speculation — but if they don’t want me here, they want to move me? I’m not going to do something where it’s going to hurt the franchise just because I have that in my contract.” If there’s any doubt why Nash wears the Captains “C,” that should just about sum it up. He wants to be here. He wants to win HERE. From his quote, yeah, if I was Nash, and Howson asked to trade me…I would feel the same way. If you approach the guy, and want to trade him, why would he stay if the organization doesn’t want him here?
Personally, I feel like the team has tried to build a winner in the wrong way. They’ve built a team entirely around Nash. They can’t expect him to shoulder that load, to carry the team the whole way. It takes more than one superstar, and role players surrounding him, to win in the NHL. If you want to build a team that competes for the Cup, which is everyones end goal, then you have to build it with multiple star caliber guys carrying the load.
I don’t think this team will be able to ice a winner until Priest and Howson are gone, and scouting and development of prospects is drastically improved. It’s pretty disgusting when you look at a “fantasy Blue Jackets” comprised of some of the players we’ve passed up on in the draft….instead selecting Filatov, Brule, etc. etc.
….it’s not just the obvious ones like Filatov, but taking Voracek instead of Logan Couture, who has turned out to be a far better prospect. It all comes down to scouting. Improve the scouting system, and the development of prospects, and the team will get turned around.
Whats the good in trading Nash for young talent, if they’re just going to sit in the press box with Johanson? Really good development plan.
This is the issue
We could have more superstars if we’d drafted better. Kopitar over Brule. That one right there would have made a HUGE difference. As good as Kopitar is now, Nash would have made him better, and vice versa.
I don’t think the club his “tried” to build around Nash only. The problem has been that they’ve sucked so much at developing all of the high draft picks that they’ve had, and therefore haven’t built any more of their own stars. Brassard is finally starting to look like a player that can play with Nash and be a “star-light” kind of guy, in that Nash makes him better and in those circumstances he can be a 60-point guy.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Every team in the NHL can go back and make a superstar team of people they didnt choose. Its easy looking back.
Yes
But I didn’t touch on the lack of development as well. We haven’t developed anybody of impact from the draft, save for Nash, Brassard, Klesla, and arguably Mason and Voracek. This, of course, isn’t including the guys who are just dipping their toes into the NHL waters (Moore, Savard, Johansen, etc.).
Consider the lineup we’re icing right now (and have on IR), from top to bottom. The only CBJ draft picks?
Nash (1st)
Brassard (1st)
Johansen (when he plays) (1st)
Dorsett (7th)
Boll (4th)
Moore (1st)
Savard (4th)
Methot (6th)
Mason (3rd)
And three of those guys are rookies; one of them (Mason) is on his way out the door due to his crappy play.
But, this is what I was getting at. We just haven’t developed our own talent over the decade we’ve been in the league, and that’s why there are no other stars on this roster. In fairness, we’ve also traded away Klesla (1st), LeClaire (1st), Voracek (1st), Filatov (1st), Zherdev (1st), Brule (1st). Only LeClaire (for Vermette), Voracek (for Carter) and Zherdev (Tyutin) were traded to legitimately make the club better, and the latter it could be argued wasn’t really in the long term plans anyway.
Yep, we’ve had 11 first round picks. Four are still here. Nary a 2nd rounder to be playing in the NHL after a decade, though. That hurts.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Filatov was the tip ranked prospect in Europe when we drafted him. One of the top rated guys in the world. It sucks how bad of a bust he was, but he was picked in accordance with how everyone scouted and ranked him…it’s not like Howson reached for a guy who flopped, he took the highest rated guy availale.
He also got us Matt culvert I’m that draft, and cam Atkinson in the 6th round who is leading the ahl right one in scoring
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 10:02 AM EST reply actions
Calvert and Atkinson, sorry iPad typing
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
Of course, we obviously could have drafted a ton better. Not arguing that was a huge issue.
Moore, Savard, Johansen, Calvert, Atkinson, maybe even Kubalik all have the chance to be solid rosters players for us in the near future, plus whatever guys we pick this year and whatever prospects we get in Nash, Carter, and other trade deals.
Johan and Moore could be turn out to be real studs in next few years.
by Re-SignZherdev on Feb 15, 2012 10:09 AM EST reply actions
Living in British Columbia...
…I always looked forward to international play so I could watch Nash play more than the once or twice a year in the few Jackets games broadcast here. I would dearly love to see Nash in Vancouver, but don’t see Schneider going anywhere until after the playoffs are over.
Flying that Nerd Flag high!

by 





















