The Right Men For The Job?
Any Jackets fans reading the paper today had a big surprise waiting for them in the report that Mike Priest and Scott Howson appear set for the long haul here in Columbus.
Don't get me wrong - I thought Howson had a pretty good summer, and made only one or two miscues, and he certainly could not have predicted the tsunami of injuries....but his commitment to both Steve Mason and Scott Arniel after both had clearly outworn their welcome is concerning, and the continued tenure of Mike Priest as team president gives me grave doubts.
If Priest was simply the VP of business operations, or a special consultant of some kind helping the team manage their bottom line, I'd call it a great fit. His work on the arena deal has been tireless, and his credentials make me think that he's a hell of a businessman. But sports management is not always the same as business management. Again and again this team has hesitated overlong on major hockey decisions, and you can't help but wonder if part of the problem is the lack of hockey knowledge in the big chair.
Would this team have somehow avoided the injuries, suspensions, and slumps with another president? Doubtful. But given the way the team has responded under Todd RIchards, perhaps decisions like removing Scott Arniel would have been made earlier, or moves to address goaltending in the last two seasons.
All I can say is that if Scott Howson and Mike Priest have a plan for this offseason, that's great, but this season should be a stark reminder that no plans survive contact with the enemy.
How will they respond when this new plan develops inevitable setbacks, dead ends, frustrations, or accidents? Who do they turn to when they need to discuss options? When key pieces are flawed, or core players end up on the shelf?
And what happens if this team is struck by the worst case scenarios once again?
It's one thing to be a slow and cautious man when making big financial decisions. Buying a house, looking at a new car, perhaps expanding a family business. But in the NHL, time is the one resource you can never get back, and hesitation has hurt this team again and again.
One of the reasons this offseason was so exciting was the way Scott Howson seemed to take the reins and MAKE things happen, not simply wait until every option had been exhausted or simply keep promising that we just needed to let our draft picks mature. Can he be trusted to take decisive action if things go sour once again? Will Craig Patrick's influence be felt in making the team more responsive and accountable? Can the men who seem to have misjudged the two biggest issues for this team over the last two years be trusted to get it right on the second (or third) try?
One of the best teachers I ever had gave an essay test at the end of every course asking about what you had learned. He told the class not to bother looking up old tests, because the questions always stayed the same - it was the answers that changed.
I'm not as concerned about this team dealing with the same questions. But I'm quite bothered that they seem to keep repeating the same answers.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If this was a Fortune 500 company, would McConnell still let these two guys have the keys to the car given what they’ve produced? I simply don’t understand. Howson, I can see some wiggle room in a debate to keep him around, however little. Mike Priest though? Is 10 years not an adequate sample size to make a good judgement? Fine, let him crunch numbers. I’m glad he’s been an invaluable asset on that front, but let’s put someone in who is a little more driven by W’s, not dollar signs, in the hockey side of the house.
I’m going to watch YouTube clips of Nail to make myself feel better.
by CannonGoesBoom on Jan 22, 2012 12:46 PM EST reply actions
Another Russian? Really?
Is there any reason to believe Nail would be different from the past two prima donna Russians we’ve drafted high? Personally, I do not want a repeat of the Zherdev and Fliatov fiascos.
by Tom _Murrell on Jan 22, 2012 5:23 PM EST up reply actions
So if we have 1st pick and the top two scouted players overall for the draft are the two Russians (Yakupov and Grigorenko), you want to pick the third best player just because they are Russian? Good thing Caps didnt do that. Same with Kovalchuk. And yes, there is reason to believe they will be different because they play in the Canadian Junior hockey league as opposed to in Russia right now. Which generally means they are more committed to the NHL. Also, Yakupov is already better at English than Zherdev was at any time here. I recommend going and watching some interviews on youtube, hes got some funny ones too. Here is a documentary done on NHLNet where you can learn more about him:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKER8i5wjLU&feature=related
Recommend starting it at the one minute mark.
Because Semin, Ovechkin, Malkin, and Kovalchuk are all awful players. And because the Jackets are having such poor luck with Tyutin and Nikitin. Right. Seriously, the idea that Russians are somehow tainted it foolish at best. Zherdev and Filatov were such flakes because of who they personally are, not what nationality they have.
I second what cbjfan14 has noted here, and encourage you to learn more about what the CHL is and what Yakupov and Grigorenko are all about. Yakupov was a rookie phenom last year in the OHL, playing and excelling in the North American style. Grigorenko is dominating this year in the Q. That kind of play is exactly the sort of thing I want to see a team draft. To pass up on players that have been universally heralded as the best in this draft would be pitiful.
CCT, CBJ, SU, NYM, Bills Fan. It can be depressing.
Sometimes I tweet things
Well you guys do have to remember, this is the Blue Jackets, the place where first round picks go to die. Doesn’t matter what nationality, I’m sure the organization will ensure that Nail fizzles before he ever has a chance to shine.
by Toxichighway on Jan 23, 2012 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
Our first rounders have not been first overalls though. Most first overalls are hard to go wrong with.
And for the record, Brassard is looking to turn out to be what we thought he should be, a second line center.
Voracek helped us fetch Carter, so i wouldnt say he went out to die either.
Moore has looked very good up in the NHL this year, and hes still only 21.
Johansen is a rookie all star this year, and going to be a great players
Even looking back a little bit. Nash was obviously a good pick.
Zherdev has a bad reputation for some reason. He actually put up good numbers here, not sure why people forget that. He wasnt as good with his teams after us, but he actually averaged .64 points per game with us. He also fetched us Tyutin in the Zherdev/ Fritche for Tyutin/Backman trade with the Rangers. Wouldnt say that first pick killed us either. Not the best, but not as bad as people make it seem in his time here.
Leclaire fetched us Vermette.
No defending the Brule, Picard picks though. Those were just bad for us. We also have failed to get any late round gems, which has to do with scouting/ developing wrong.
And I am not trying to defend our drafting too much, as there have obviously been better choice that we should have made than most of the players listed above, but its not as bad as people make it seem.
Well, at least the last five years havent been as bad.
Brule
That one is especially rough when one considers the word on the street that our scouts wanted Kopitar and Dougie Mac overruled them. In fairness, it’s not like Kopitar went right behind us… he was on the board for five more picks. Still, though, that first round had the following guys taken after us:
Devin Setoguchi
Kopitar
Marc Staal
Tuukka Rask
TJ Oshie
Ouch.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Picard
I went back and looked at that 2004 draft. Behind Ovechkin and Malkin, man, it was a pretty shitty draft. Only FOUR players that were ever All-Stars in the ENTIRE draft, and two of them went 1-2 (others were Mike Green, whom the Caps got at #29, and Pekka Rinne, who went #258—the last pick of the eighth round). Holy crap, that’s bad. Not much the Jackets could do, there.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Wow, your right that was a bad draft. From where we picked, there really wasnt much around us. Would have been nice to get some of those nice picks in the future rounds. But that can be said for any draft. Even Dubnyk or Meczaros would have been nice in there. Schneider at 26. Where would we be if we picked him? So easy to look back at it and look at the hundreds of missed opportunities by every team.
Its almost like the hockey gods just wanted to give the NHL Malkin and Ovechkin and call it over to even it out with other drafts. Amazing how that can happen only one year after the giant 2003 draft. We fu%$ed up big time picking Zherdev. Vanek went one pick after, Suter 3 after. Phaneuf 9, Carter 11, the list goes on an on. What a draft that was.
I i had to choose between Priest and Howson as to who should be fired, it would be Priest. I actually havent minded Howson. He has given out a few bad contracts and his patience can be frustrating at times, but he always impresses me with his answers and I think he knows what needs to be done, its just a matter of getting it done. Hopefully Patrick will help Howson become a better GM. Not many good GM’s out there right now. JFJ sure as hell isnt a better option than Howson.
Only Hope?
I have decided that the only hope for this franchise is if this story represents the dreaded vote of confidence that precedes a change. Often, when a team is going bad, Senior Management gives a vote of confidence that often means that they’re looking for a replacement or two. My only hope is that this story represents that for Priest and Howson.
Otherwise, the disaster that is the CBJ will continue.
Yep
It’s always easier to stab someone in the back while patting it than in front. :-)
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Well, I’m glad Mason’s on his way out, at least. It’s just a testament to the great job Howson has done to hang on to him so long, that the former Calder winner might net us nothing in return (via the waiver wire).
Looks like I won’t be caring about this franchise well into next season, either.
At this point...
…wouldn’t it be better for the franchise to unload that salary? The only thing we’ll get in return right now is a bad contract.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Key words: AT THIS POINT. Yes, at this point in time, that’s clearly the best option.
I think we could have gotten so much more had we dealt him earlier on. That’s where my anger with the whole ordeal lies. He never even LOOKED like he was going to turn the corner at any point during his freefall, as he couldn’t even link two solid games together. The writing was on the wall long ago. But yes, at this point, I’d be glad to get him off the books.
Its easy to sit here today and say that, but at the time it would have been premature for a GM to give up on a young promising goalie who won the Calder. Although Mason, Rinne, and Quick all came in to the league at the same time and Mason was the best out of the three, you have to remember Mason is only 23 years old. Rinne is 29 and Quick is 25. Goalies dont usually break into this league until 26 years old. Mason did it at 20.
So according to you, you were willing to give up on a 22 year goalie only a couple years off of winning the Calder? Maybe in fantasy hockey, but no way i would want to do that if im a general manage in the NHL. If Mason were traded elsewhere at 21/22 and became a great goalie at 24/25, Howson would have immediately been under fire by every fan in the organization and he probably would have been fired at some point.
To add on to it, we didnt have any other goalie available. Our goalie depth in the organization is not that strong right now.
Maybe we can get Subban in the upcoming draft, but he is still far removed from the NHL
Not after a second terrible year, it wouldn’t be. Face it, he should not have been here this year. And there should have been at least one stint to the AHL during his freefall. It was as if they were just crossing their fingers and praying he’d turn it around, but didn’t really offer him the tools to do so.
Like I said, I don’t recall a two-game stretch where he’s played solid since that rookie campaign. That should have been a red-flag to send him down for a conditioning stint…Garon last year and Sanford this year could handle the fort while he was away. He’s clearly lost all confidence, something that happened in his sophomore slump, but nothing was done about it.
I’ve been clamoring for him to go ever since his “junior year” started off just as bad as his sophomore slump. The fact that the organization did nothing but cross its fingers and pray for a 180 signifies to me they put way too much stock in him to begin with and, in essence, gave up on him long before now. He has not been given a chance to develop properly, so he’s useless to us. Even now, I wouldn’t be surprised to see him break out and become a solid goaltender somewhere else, where he can be eased into a starting role instead of forced into it.
But like I said, the writing’s been on the wall for a while.
by Toxichighway on Jan 23, 2012 2:14 PM EST up reply actions
He played well pretty much all of January 2011, coincidentally when the Jackets were still flirting with the playoffs.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
I guess I’ll give you that, even though his strong Jan./Feb. still resulted in a paltry .901/3.03 overall on the season. Those aren’t the numbers of a goaltender that will get you far in the playoffs, if he even gets you in at all.
by Toxichighway on Jan 23, 2012 7:02 PM EST up reply actions
Like i said above, it is easy to sit here today and say we should have given up on him two years ago. As a GM, it would have been premature to get rid of him that early. Howson would have been scolded if only two years after we traded him he was a top goalie like he was supposed to be. It was too early, especially at his age.
He has shown a few times for a couple games in a row a good stretch. He did it earlier in the season ending in Dallas. He has decent home stats. But his away stats suck. That may have to do with the age factor of a goalie. Hes young.
Howson has made some good moves and some bad moves
You can’t blame him for giving Mason one more chance. he did win a Calder and looked like a franchise goalie in that year. This is the most talented team we’ve ever had, only being shutout one time this year is nothing to scoff at. Injuries and the Shannahammer has been our undoing this year.
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Lloyd, Andy Russell, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene, Curtis Martin, Willie Roaf, Andre Reed and Jerry Kramer
"Clemson should've stopped turning the ball over" Dana Holgorsen when asked about running up the score in the Orange Bowl

























