Should He Stay or Should He Go? Anton Stralman
Name: Anton Stralman
Position: Defenseman
Status: Restricted Free Agent
2010-2011 Salary/Cap Hit: $1,950,000 / $1,950,000
Last Three Years' Stats:
|
GP |
G |
A |
PTS |
+/- |
PIM |
|
51 |
1 |
17 |
18 |
-11 |
22 |
|
73 |
6 |
28 |
34 |
-17 |
37 |
|
38 |
1 |
12 |
13 |
-2 |
20 |
When he was originally acquired by Scott Howson from Calgary for a third round pick in 2009, Anton Stralman looked like the missing piece of the puzzle for the Jackets' back end. Contributing a power play goal in his first game, Stralman's point production from the blue line made up for the grumbles over his sometimes frustrating defense, and after Howson was able to get him back under contract without having to go through Salary Arbitration and a big raise from his entry level $750,000 deal, much was expected. Many thought he would be a key contributor under Scott Arniel with the man advantage, perhaps even improving from his 34 point season. Instead, he spent part of the year injured and much of it in the press box after making miscue after miscue, frequently negating the very power plays he was supposed to be aiding. Named the team's midseason goat by Puck Daddy, and the general sense by the end of the year was don't let the door hit you on the way out...
What's He Worth?
If Stralman had put up another 30+ point season, his 1.95 million salary would have been a relative bargain. His price tag puts him in a similar ballpark to fellow RFAs Karl Alzner, Matt Gilroy, or Shane O'Brien, but each of these defensemen offers...well...actual defense. Adrian Aucoin comes in at a slightly higher cap hit, but he's also put up much more reliable offensive numbers throughout his career, and again, a much more defensively reliable player. It seems almost certain that Stralman will take a pay cut if he stays at the NHL level - I just cannot see an GM offering him more than his current salary with only one solid season of NHL production on his resume.
What Should The CBJ Offer?
A warm handshake and hearty wishes for good luck on July 1st. Scott Howson has already said that the team's defense must improve - that it is his top priority for this offseason. Stralman's locker has already been cleaned out and the team will happily accept a new occupant, whether he comes through trades or free agency. The experiment, for lack of a better word, with Stralman was unsuccessful. Perhaps in a few more years he'll have the seasoning to balance defensive responsibility with offensive production, but the Blue Jackets don't have time to wait.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I will help pack his bags and drive him to the airport.
All hockey-related things aside, it now seems really awkward that Scott Howson was Stralman’s best man at his wedding. I’m sure he’s not as close to him as I’m close to my best man, but still, that’s an unfortunately uncomfortable situation for everyone.
At the time, though, it was the only way to get his fiancee / wife into the US. Needs must at times like that.
Editor for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter (if you're in the mood to be bored!)
by Matt Wagner on Jun 22, 2011 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Right, I understand it had to be done, but the memory of their wedding day should last longer than Stralman’s playing career. Maybe I just feel sorry for him that his family and friends couldn’t be there. Pretty unrelated to hockey though, so uhh…
…who’s meeting me to see him off?
by SirChadlyOC on Jun 22, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn’t be surprised at all if they had a more “proper” ceremony later that year. Plus, there’s no guarantee he’s done, even if I do suspect he’ll be playing in another organization. Toronto was willing to draft him, Calgary took a good shot at him, then us. I wouldn’t be shocked if he ends up back in another team’s system, even if it’s on a two way deal.
Editor for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter (if you're in the mood to be bored!)
by Matt Wagner on Jun 22, 2011 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Stralman reminded me this year of the Peter Gibbons line from “Office Space”: “You know Bob, that will only make someone work hard enough NOT to get fired.” Stralman did pick his game up at certain points this season, but it was only after being scratched and/or seeing John Moore come up and [south park] “theytookourjobs!!” [/south park] him.
Stralman always seemed disinterested to me, and while he has enough talent and skill to catch on somewhere, I pray (and assume) it will not be here.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
by Dan P. on Jun 22, 2011 1:12 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I don’t see why we’re ready to pack Stralman’s bags but still want to hold on to Russell. Stralman has had more NHL success and is only 9 months older. If I had my choice I would stick with the guy who’s actually put up a 30 point season.
Stralman is 24 and put up 34 points two years ago. The talent is there. I don’t want to hear any of this effort crap, we’ve been over it here enough. Sometimes players don’t play well, even if they’re trying.
I’m not saying I definitely want to keep him. I probably don’t. But he’s not as bad as everyone here is making him out to be.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Jun 22, 2011 1:53 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Main reason for me is that Stralman’s a free agent, and Russell is signed for one more year. Unless GMSH can find a trade taker for Russ (doubtful given his season last year and his current injury), we KNOW we’re stuck with him for one more year.
Writer for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets blog
Follow me on Twitter
"I will say anything to be funny, often in the most horrible situations, which is one reason [a] good [woman] so far [has] been very sorry on occasion to have married me." --Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
I mean as long as everyone holds a low opinion of Kris too then I have no argument, because as you said we’re stuck with him. It just seemed to me as if people were holding out more hope for Kris than Anton, when there’s really no reason to.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Jun 22, 2011 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Not only is Russell signed, but Stralman is an RFA that makes $1.95m. To keep him from unrestricted free agency, they would have to tender him a qualifying offer at $1.95m. He would accept that QO in a second and be making double what he should be. You take Russell at $1.3 over Stralman at $1.95 everyday and twice on Sundays.
Again that’s not my point. My point is simply that people seem to be assessing Stralman’s on-ice value differently than Russell’s. If the contract situation were switched, I’m willing to be a few people would want to re-sign Kris. That means one of two things: people are over-valuing Russell or under-valuing Stralman.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Jun 23, 2011 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions
If we sign Stralman our entire offseason is a failure. We came in needing a lot of new defensemen and if we sign him, we are right back where we were.
Do you also believe that failure idea for all of the defensemen? Because it’s only fair – while Stralman is the one everybody piles on, much of the rest of the blueline was equally terrible. Really, the only players worth keeping are ones with upside – better to have an “AHL” defense that can improve than the dead-end group from this year.
Clarkson Golden Knights and Columbus Blue Jackets Fan
Essential Listening
Let me clarify. Our offseason would be a failure because we came in really needing a defensive overhaul. We came in already having Tyutin and Russell under contract with Methot, Lepisto, and Stralman all RFA. We pretty much know that we are going to sign Methot and we have already signed Clitsome. So we have four defensmen right there most likely coming back next year. Its been said by the Dispatch (for what its worth) that we want to sign Hejda and im sure we wouldnt mind bringing back Lepisto. So lets say we sign one of those two. Thats five defensemen coming back next year assumming no trade is made. Then if we sign Stralman that six right there.
I dont know about you but thats not good for me going into next season. I know you think all the defensemen are bad, and they are, but IMO Stralman was far worse than anyone else we had. He looked like he did not care and i really dont think he did. It wasnt that he just wasnt playing well, he just isnt good. Russell was bad too, but at least Russell tries and hes got speed in his favor so i could see him being a lot better than Stralman in the future.
But anyways, the only point i was trying to make was that if we sign Stralman, we failed at making our defense better like we wanted and needed to do going into next season. I dont see a point in signing Stralman unless we are running our of pylons for practice.
This is exactly what I was talking about above. Stralman has been an average NHL player for a full season before. Russell has done it for a stretches no longer than about five games at a time about twice a year. One of these guys has proven the potential is there, the other one is small and can’t shoot, pass or defend.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Jun 23, 2011 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions

























