Why is Scott Arniel still the coach?
Let me start by getting this out of the way: I don't care that the Blue Jackets won against Winnipeg on Saturday.
One thing that really got under my skin from Matt's recap of Scott Howson's Q&A with season ticket holders was this:
Howson was asked about the coaching staff, and if he had considered a coaching change, and his answer was an immediate "We are not." When asked why, with the oft repeated stat of 5 wins in 36 regular season games shouted at him from the crowd ... "We believe that Scott Arniel is a good coach and needs a chance to work through this. The way Mr. Mac and J.P. McConnell run their businesses, you hire the best people and you give them a chance. I don't make excuses, but the coach needs to have some of the players we acquired in the lineup before we make a final judgement." On the other hand, he also admitted that both he and Arniel only have so much time to turn things around, or they could find themselves out of their jobs as well. "That's professional sports."
He also admitted that the team has backed off and tried to protect leads too often rather than getting aggressive in games vs. Colorado and Anaheim, and that was a coaching decision that he had discussed with Arniel. Despite the faith Howson expressed, his body language seemed somewhat strained on the subject of his coach - I really wonder if he is as unsatisfied with some of the recent coaching decisions as the fans.
In a perfect world, Jeff Carter would have been healthy, James Wisniewski wouldn't have been suspended, and Mark Dekanich wouldn't have been hurt, again, this time during pre-game warmups.
Then again, in a perfect world, would Kristian Huselius have been injured? Had he never been hurt, the team would have never thought of acquiring Vinny Prospal. Prospal has been one of the few bright spots and honest voices this season.
Point being, you can't blame the bad circumstances just as much as you can't lean on the good breaks. What happens if, God forbid, a key player goes down with a season-ending injury? Do you just throw up your hands and say, "Well, there's always next year!"
That may very well be the Blue Jackets response, if the start of this season is any indication.
I'm firmly on board with all the moves Scott Howson has made this season. Bringing on Mark Letestu and Nikita Nikitin may have been small moves, but they're players that want to show up and work hard every day and earn their ice time.
The players that have looked good at times this year are the ones that don't need to be prodded to play hard: Prospal, Letestu, Wisniewski, Carter, Ryan Johansen, Grant Clitsome, and a few others.
But what about Rick Nash, Antoine Vermette, and Derick Brassard? How can they all be playing this poorly? Is it a lack of accountability from the coach? Not a proper set of goals and expectations from practices to game days? I don't think it's any coincidence that Kris Russell was the first player traded. He would have been included in this group had he not be dealt to St. Louis.
If the coach can't get his best players to play, it needs to be on the players to hold each other accountable. If the players can't do that, it's on the GM to make the correct moves. I think Howson has started down that path. I also believe Nash, Vermette, and R.J. Umberger can be a part of the solution here. I'm still not sure about Brassard.
I'm afraid that if the team sits too long on Arniel, the players that are holding this team together by the few threads that are left will be trade bait. If Prospal, Letestu, and others are moved at or before the trade deadline, this team will be in even worse shape. The organization will point to the draft picks and prospects acquired and try to play up the future. But that will be just another mistake. And if the team finally decides late in the season or next off-season that a coaching change is indeed necessary, how much longer will we be expected to grant him to put his system in place and begin to gel with the players? That was our excuse this October. I don't want it to be the excuse next October.
I still believe the team has a good core in place, and Scott Howson has an idea of what he's doing. I don't think Arniel is the coach that will get this team to play their best, now or in a year. Good coaches get fired every year. Lindy Ruff and Barry Trotz are the only exceptions.
The Jackets have more talent on the roster now than ever before. Other teams have had awful seasons, but have eventually turned it around with adding the right players and the right coach. The Blackhawks turned a corner when Joel Quenneville was brought in. Terry Murray and the roster upgrades have helped the Los Angeles Kings become a legitimate contender. Peter Laviolette seems unphased that the Flyers traded Jeff Carter and Mike Richards a season after finishing with a 47-23-12 record.
This team doesn't need a coach who is looking to build his NHL experience as much as half of his players are. This team needs someone who has been around the block, and won't take half efforts at practice as an acceptable game plan.
Of the potential options, three names caught my eye. These individuals all have some hockey-related obligations, but none are currently coaching in the NHL or AHL, so there should be no major roadblocks for the Blue Jackets to interview - if they were so inclined.
Bob Hartley - .581 winning percentage, 1 Stanley Cup, 5 playoff appearances. Between his time with the Colorado Avalanche and Atlanta Thrashers, Hartley has a pretty impressive resume. Even more impressive if you throw in his Calder Cup win with the Hershey Bears in 1997. In Atlanta, he helped Ilya Kovalchuk find his game and turned around a pretty awful Thrashers team, improving each year before he was let go in 2008 after an 0-6 start.
Guy Carbonneau - .539 winning percentage, 1 playoff appearance. Not as much coaching experience here, but he helped the Canadiens to some pretty respectable records in his brief tenure. Carbonneau is a three-time Stanley Cup winner as a player.
Marc Crawford - .518 winning percentage, 1 Stanley Cup, 8 playoff appearances. Crawford is personally my least favorite of the three, but still has a very impressive track record. He won honors as the top coach in both the NHL and AHL during his time as a coach. He didn't have great success in his last two stops, LA or Dallas, although he did finish last season 42-29-11 with the Stars, but was let go after missing the playoffs for a second straight season.
So, there you have it. Three strong options that I believe would be able to better utilize the talent we have than Scott Arniel currently has been. Again, I have to ask, why is Scott Arniel still the coach?
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for the post Andy.
Of the options you offer, I like Hartley the best.
I am in full agreement with your first paragraph. Two goals from a rookie (an awesome rookie, btw) and a Prospal assist were the highlights. I’m still not seeing names like Nash, Umby, etc on the scoresheets…like you, I’m waiting for everybody else to show up at this party. Two points against the Jets isn’t really cause for celebration. At best, it offered a temporary reprieve for the inevitable.
Co-Founder, Springfield Hockey Heritage Society
Editor of The Cannon, a Columbus Blue Jackets Blog. Check us out!
I’m liking Bob Hartley, as well. Think we can get Suzanne Pleshette to come along as his wife?
"If less is more, think how much more MORE is!"
by pete goegan on Nov 14, 2011 12:28 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Unfortunately, the only way Suzanne Pleshette would be there is if we have a seance.
by flyersphan17 on Nov 30, 2011 4:05 PM EST up reply actions
after 7 coaches in our history...
maybe its the players, and not the coaching? Though I think whatever kind of development system we have sucks, i think our problem is the players are too good of buddy-buddies. No one wants to call each other out. Its all most like the players dont care about winning, and when someone half asses it, no one will say anything. Ive notice the captain play his ass off in games we were getting embarassed, but because he isnt a vocal guy, the other players dont respond. I think we should pick up Trevor Gilles and when the team starts to quit, he fights our own players instead, and thats his job.
Agreed...
…It was Arniel behind the bench this time last season when the Jackets were one of the best teams in the Conference.
So why is the team the worst in the league now, and with a better roster?
It has to be the players in my opinion.
Playing for 1st Round Draft Picks since 2000!
by PomeroyCBJFan on Nov 14, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions
It was Arniel behind the bench this time last season when the Jackets were one of the best teams in the Conference.
It was also Arniel who admitted the team was extremely lucky to be in that position and not playing great hockey.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Nov 14, 2011 7:13 PM EST up reply actions
I think the team would lay down fir the next coach, but I guess we’ll have to wait and see.
Playing for 1st Round Draft Picks since 2000!
by PomeroyCBJFan on Nov 15, 2011 12:20 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
I don’t think the team is laying down for Arniel. I think either the players or the system is just bad.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
by notthatnoise on Nov 15, 2011 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
Oh god, please dont use “pick up” and “Trevor Gillies” in the same sentence. That guy doesnt even deserve to step on the ice.
What confuses me the most is our poor starts in too many games. It should be the coaches job to motivate the players to go out on the ice and be ready to go right away. Im concerned Arniel hasnt done a good enough job at doing that. Our players also seem to be confused at times to where they are suposed to be located. I especially noticed it during the neutral zone regroup Saturday against the Jets. Our defensemen had the puck entering the neutral zone and everyone else just seemed to look at each other confused as to what they should do.
Agreed on the poor (slow) starts.
I always wonder how a group of men playing a game they love and have played since they were near toddler age – and are getting paid handsomely to do so, can come out “flat” as they have admitted before.
Excuse me??? I would kill to be a professional athlete. I have always had the desire and the fire, I just lacked the skills. How can they be flat or not up for every game? Even if they aren’t up for a game (illness and injury are acceptable excuses) why would you admit that aloud to the press?
It’s a head scratcher to me…
Just once I'd like someone to call me "Sir," without adding, "You're making a scene."
Every team comes out “flat” at one time or another. You have to realize that players are humans, too. Maybe some of them are having bad days, or going through things in their lives that prevents them from competing at a high level. I mean, even rec-league teams have off days, and I can’t think of another level where it’s truly for love of the game. It just happens.
Plus, the money thing always seems like a motivator to those that don’t have any (myself included). But for these guys, hockey is their job. It seems fun to bystanders, but when you have to practice, train, eat, breathe, and live hockey 24/7, it can quickly suck the “fun” out. It’s hard to think from our side, but they can lose the passion and will to play just like anyone can lose passion or have hatred for their own jobs.
However, I do completely agree on your point about them looking passionless for every game. THAT, I do believe, falls on the coaching staff more than anything else. The negative atmosphere in the dressing room, which has been alluded to, should also fall on the coaching staff, who should never allow a team to get so down on themselves. To me, that’s the main sign Arniel has been around too long…when negative thoughts and feelings almost become a part of the locker room.
by Toxichighway on Nov 14, 2011 6:24 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed. I don’t know all the ins and outs of hockey strategy, but it seems to me Arniel isn’t getting the job done. In another post someone mentioned we are doing well in all the stats that would indicate we are playing Arniel’s system well, but we aren’t seeing results. Maybe the problem isn’t the players, maybe it’s that they aren’t being asked to do things that win games.
Arniel’s system works great in the AHL, where teams are more prone to mistakes and goalies let in soft goals. But shooting the puck indiscriminately doesn’t work in the NHL.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools" -Hemingway
For entertainment purposes, why not sign Mike Keenan? We will get to see 20 goalie changes, a fight with management, three bench meltdowns, and he will resign before he gets fired. The best part is that it will all happen in a 15 day stretch and it will keep everyone from noticing that Vermette still hasn’t scored a goal by December.
great analysis but I disagree
First, I believe Arniel is extremely tough on the team, and I think the players fear his wrath. That doesn’t explain the under-performing of guys like Nash, Vermette, Umberger, Brass, etc…
Looking at this team, I think until games are actually won, it is not fair to compare them to Chicago, LA, etc…despite what is on paper.
Any coach would have their hands full with this roster, because the Blue Line is still thin. The goal-tending is too soft at times. The injuries are a reality.
I am just not sure a coaching change is what this team needs. I too am sick of the “wait until next season” mentality. But at this point, there aren’t any coaches out there that will come in and immediately transform this team into a playoff contender. That should be out the window…the focus should be watching this team gradually improve. Because I think the discipline is there, and the team simply has to find its confidence and continue to grow. It takes time!
The fact is, a lot of teams are “supposed to suck.” How many people were down on Colorado nad Edmonton going into this year?
Yeah, the defense is thin, but if Methot and Clitsome hadn’t more or less regressed and Tyutin stayed the same, we might not be singing that tune. And that could’ve helped make Mason look better too.
Hitch is the only coach in recent memory that was actually able to get more out of his players instead of just saying, “Well, I don’t have the caliber of players in Chicago or Detroit.”
Editor for The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter - @andynewman
Prodded to Play Hard
“The players that have looked good at times this year are the ones that don’t need to be prodded to play hard: Prospal, Letestu, Wisniewski, Carter, Ryan Johansen, Grant Clitsome, and a few others.”
Many fans in Philly would argue that Carter needed a fire lit under his butt to play hard. I’m not one of them, but none the less the argument was always made that he took games not just periods off.

by 





















