Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

Players to Protect - the Blue Jackets and the SBN Mock NHL Expansion Draft

LOS ANGELES, CA - JUNE 25:  An overall view of the draft floor during the 2010 NHL Entry Draft at Staples Center on June 25, 2010 in Los Angeles, California.  (Photo by Jeff Gross/Getty Images)

As the SBNation Mock NHL Expansion rolls on, we now know that we'll be seeing the return of the Winnipeg Jets and Quebec Nordiques. (Biased voting? What? No, never...)

The next step is for each team to designate a portion of their roster as "protected". For Columbus, this is something of a unique experience, since the last time the NHL expanded it was for, well, us! 

After we received guidelines based on the rules for the 2000 NHL expansion, Mike, Andrew, Andy, and I sat down and figured out our list of players - take a look after the jump and let us know what you think, or if there are any changes you think need to be made! Our final list is due into the "league" by Thursday, 9/2.

Edit: Changes have been made! Our list will be finalized at 8:00pm on Wednesday, 9/1! 

Star-divide

First off, the rules:

  • Teams can either protect 1 goalie, 5 defensemen, and 9 forwards OR 2 goalies, 3 defensemen and 7 forwards.
  • If using the 2 goalie system, at least one goalie left unprotected must have played in at least 10 games in the previous NHL season, or 25 games in the last 2 seasons combined. (They must have played in at least 31 minutes of each game for it to count.)
  • Each team must leave unprotected at least one defenseman who appeared in 40 games last season, or 70 games in the last two seasons combined.
  • Each team must leave unprotected at least 2 forwards who appeared in 40 games last season, or 70 games in the last two seasons combined.
  • Players who have played in 49 or fewer NHL games are automatically exempt from the draft and do not need to be protected.

I bolded that last point because it simplifies things quite a bit. No need to protect Filatov, John Moore, Matt Calvert, Ryan Johansen, David Savard, or Gustav Wesslau. Of course, given Columbus' relative youth in goal, it also means we HAVE to use the 1 goalie system - if we protected both Mason and Garon, we don't have a goaltender who meets the 10/25 game rule.

So, with that in mind, who did we select?

Goaltender: Steve Mason.

-Fairly obvious, really. Mason is our starter, and regardless of what you think of his chances to rebound to his Calder winning form, you can't let him get poached in the draft. If Garon is selected, it just means Wesslau's path to the NHL is accelerated.

Defense: Kris Russell, Fedor Tyutin, Mike Commodore, Jan Hejda, and Anton Stralman.

-Not surprisingly, this was one of the areas with some debate. Russell and Stralman were no-brainers, to protect our (weak) puck moving capabilities, but after that it's wide open. While it's doubtful an expansion team would have taken Commodore based on his contract, I felt that his skills (when healthy) and voice in the locker room made him worth making sure we kept. Hejda is simply too much of a bargain to allow to walk away right now, and Tyutin has more upside in his game than Methot or Klesla. 

With Columbus' huge amount of prospect D, this could also open the doors for players like John Moore, David Savard, or Grant Clitsome

Forwards: Rick Nash, R.J. Umberger, Antoine Vermette, Derick Brassard, Jakub Voracek, Sammy Pahlsson, Derek Dorsett, Kristian Huselius, and Chris Clark.

-With Nikita Filatov protected by the under 40 games rule, Columbus is actually in a position to protect all of their skill players, particularly Nash, Umberger, Vermette, and Voracek. Based on your feedback, we've protected Chris Clark over Jared Boll, so he'll be added to the pool of "unprotected" forwards. (Ethan Moreau, Derek MacKenzie, Mike Blunden, or Andrew Murray), Clark and Pahlsson are likely to anchor the third and fourth lines, which the team can populate with guys like Matt Calvert, Tomas Kana, or Matt Rust.

So, there you have it, Jacket Fans. Anyone stand out? Are we making a huge mistake by choosing other defensemen over Klesla or Methot? Is Andrew Murray more important than I suspect? Let us know in the comments!

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Fillin’ out the roster with Matt Calvert!

Can I just ask, were any of the players you left out (Ethan Moreau, for example) hurt by their contracts/cap hits?

Man-crushin' on Boucher since 1999
Broad Street Hockey - Makin' it look mean since 1967.
SB Nation Philly - Associate Editor

by Geoff Detweiler on Aug 30, 2010 9:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Calvert’s protected already. :)

I left Moreau open because I really question if he’s adding much to the team as it is, and I’d rather protect a skill player than a “grit” player. (Though I admit that Dorsett and Boll both push this. See below.)

Editor for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter (if you're in the mood to be bored!)

by Matt Wagner on Aug 30, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

players like Moreau ( atleast at this point in his career) are a dime a dozen.

by FFmorgan89 on Sep 6, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good List . .. Except

Can’t disagree with much here except Boll, and perhaps Dorsett. I would much rather protect Moreau, Blunden or Murray than Boll, who brings little skill to the table, and no longer has the fighting ability. Nice guy, but . . . Dorsett is on the fence. Great energy, some improving skill, but really a “dime a dozen” guy who gets hurt too much, makes bad, bad mistakes and is not good in his own end.

I agree with the calls on Methot and Klesla — many will disagree, but Stralman has far more upside.

by Jeff Little on Aug 30, 2010 9:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Just curious – why Moreau over Chris Clark?

I know Moreau isn’t a fighter, but he isn’t exactly what I’d call a skill guy, either. Boll has, at least, show flashes of scoring ability.

In Dorsett’s case, the thing that tipped the scales for me is that A on his chest. Dorsett is the first REALLY home grown member of the leadership group. (Nash with the C is….a decision that I ultimately am OK with, but I think that it was a situation forced as much by his talent as his real leadership levels.) I think that’s a valuable thing to retain.

Editor for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter (if you're in the mood to be bored!)

by Matt Wagner on Aug 30, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Keep Dorsett

we don’t need Boll, Last year Dorsett had a +6 rating while Boller had a -8, so I think I would keep the better defensive player

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Don't wory, I'm an untrained professional" WVPF
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan

by WVPiratesfan on Aug 31, 2010 1:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Fair enough. Who should we protect in his place?

Editor for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter (if you're in the mood to be bored!)

by Matt Wagner on Aug 31, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Chris Clark wouldn't be a bad option

brings alot of experience and ledership to the table that Boller just doesn’t have

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Don't wory, I'm an untrained professional" WVPF
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan

by WVPiratesfan on Aug 31, 2010 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, so I’m going to edit the post to say that we’re protecting Chris Clark instead of Jared Boll.

Any other changes? I’m “locking” our list at 8pm Wednesday night, so make sure you let us know if you want us to protect or risk anyone else!

Editor for The Cannon - A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter (if you're in the mood to be bored!)

by Matt Wagner on Aug 31, 2010 9:00 PM EDT reply actions  

I like your list but the only thing i would trade is keeping Klesla over Commodore. i think like you said commodore probably wouldnt be taken because of his contract. and even if he is that just means nearly 4 million is taken off the books. plus i would also like the last remaining “original” jacket to remain in cbus if possible. im not saying klesla is a better D man than Commy. but i think there would be a better chance of both staying if Klesla is protected.

by FFmorgan89 on Sep 6, 2010 5:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Personally, I leave Stralman unprotected. I don’t think he’s going to be here too long anyway, and Rusty is a better fit.

by FlaggerX on Sep 8, 2010 1:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Columbus Blue Jackets.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Trade Rumors? Enough Already!
Small
All Star Game? Not Good Enough
Small
Not Gonna See it Live! (Event)
41_small
2012-13 CBJ
Small
One Fan's View On Roster Moves For Next Year
Small
ARNIEL FIRED!
Small
A Rant Directed At Scott Arniel
Small
An Open Letter To Scott Howson
Hockeyboy_small
Visiting Columbus -- Advice?
Clarkson_knight_logos_small
Jacket Stats: Career Goals Per Game

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Central Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Detroit 52 35 16 1 71
St. Louis 50 30 13 7 67
Nashville 52 31 17 4 66
Chicago 53 29 17 7 65
Columbus 52 14 32 6 34

(updated 2.4.2012 at 6:07 PM EST)

14 - 32 - 6

Won 1


Manager

Mikeheadshot_small Mike MacLean

Writers

Andy-newman_small Andy Newman

Headshot_small Matt Wagner

Gog_colum_750px_horiz_beer_small Dan P.

Shhslogo_small Lou Bordeaux