So was R.J. Correct in saying that the Caps play the game wrong
If only this picture was from this series
After the Upset of the decade, I know its soon but unless a expansion team beats a team in the playoffs I don't think you can top this one, our own R.J. Umberger's comments from earlier in the year started to float around again. To quote him on his feelings about how the Capitals play the game of Hockey.
"I don't think any team in the West would be overmatched by them," Umberger said. "They play the wrong way. They want to be moving all the time. They float around in their zone, looking for breakaways and odd-man rushes.
"A good defensive team is going to beat them (in the playoffs). If you eliminate your turnovers and keep them off the power play, they're going to get frustrated because they're in their zone a lot."
Now on the surface it looks like R.J. is a prophet, or a prophet of doom if you are a Capitals fan, all but saying that the capitals will collapse in the first round of the playoffs if they face a good defensive team. Well in the wreckage of the Capitals playoff collapse lets look at a few contributors to this playoffs failure
- Jaroslav Halak playing out his mind
- The Capitals inability to score on the Power Play, the went 1-34 in the last three games
- The Capitals inability to score in general, 3 goals in the last three games by the team that scored 384 in the regular season
- Bruce Boudreau's bad managing during the Series
- The Canadiens doing what Washington feared most, manning up on Ovie
- The Caps are built to play the way they play
First thing Jaroslav Halak played out of his mind during this series. After being pulled from game 4 of the series he came back and a Save% of .978 in the last three games of the series, let that sink in for a second of 134 shots face he stopped 131 of them and had countless other blocked by he other players. The statistic of the Washington Capitals with all of their fire power went 1-34 and the man advantage is stunning. Add that to the fact that they scored 3 goals in three games you have to start wondering the Habs made a deal with the devil to win this series. Now on to Bruce Boudreau and his handling of this series, First off he pulls the goalie he said he would pull, who was that Goalie you ask Jose Threeorfour Theodore. That should have been red flag that said this was about to be handled poorly, one of the Caps leading scorers for the regular season Tomas Fleischmann was benched for game 7. Now on to the fact that Ovie doesn't like it when people man up on him, why you ask simple he just tries to skate around guys and that hard to do when you have the entire defense of the other team manning up on him because they know he isn't going to pass the puck, think about it how do you score 50 goals a year by passing the puck, so when Alexander the "great" was shut down so went the rest of the Caps offense.
Now on to the last thing if the caps are built to play this way and in the last three years they are 1-3 in game sevens shouldn't that be a sign that mabye the team is built the wrong way.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
Goal and D, not really the game style
Curiously, I’d say that the Caps played exactly the games they should have in games 2, 3 and 4. They brought it to Halak, they generated lots of offense, and ended up winning 6-5, 5-1 and 6-3. Those are some pretty convincing displays.
I think that they simply let off the gas, and that their coach was unable to get a fire back under his players. Particularly, Semin and Green were completely invisible, only showing up when they were giving the puck away. I think that if the Caps would have kept pushing the net, rather than pushing the tempo, they would have been in much better shape.
But to be perfectly fair, the Caps style of game should have won them that series. Games 2, 3 and 4 displayed Montreal as a team that couldn’t keep up with big Caps guns. I think the shortcoming comes in the Caps own end: their defense and goaltending.
With a good shut-down D-pair, they could have played this up-tempo game more successfully. Instead, they were faced with turnovers that led the Habs to see Theodore or Varly. Varly is clearly the better playoff choice, but neither is a good option. This is honestly a problem CBJ have faced all year: if we would have had better defense and a better presence in goal, things would have been much better.
Really, what killed the Caps wasn’t what RJ saw – it was what everyone knew all along: poor defense and goaltending will lose you playoff games, no matter what your offense is or isn’t.
I don’t know who that was, but it wasn’t Jaroslav Halak. Pittsburgh better watch out.
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
"Turner, at midcourt...inside it, at the buzzer, GOT IT!!!!"
by Andrew Tolliver on Apr 30, 2010 8:53 AM EDT reply actions
As I stated he was playing out of his mind
He had a SV% of .978 in those last three game, against the Capitals
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"It's a great day to be a mountaineer, where ever you may be" Tony Caridi
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
by WVPiratesfan on Apr 30, 2010 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Video game numbers, man, video game numbers.
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
"Turner, at midcourt...inside it, at the buzzer, GOT IT!!!!"
by Andrew Tolliver on Apr 30, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
My two cents...
I think RJ was right. The Caps do play a free wheeling type of play and when you figure out a way to shut that down you are going to have success against them. You can’t be weak in your defensive zone and expect to win championships it just doesn’t happen. You can have all of the fire power in the world but if you aren’t sound defensively you are going to give up a lot of goals. I’m not saying that they give up 6 or 7 goals a game, just that when other teams turn up the heat and get turnovers they convert with those chances.
With that being said, I don’t think the Caps know how to play any other way. You live by the offense, you die by the offense. I agree with most of what Zeke said, I do think the Caps thought they had the series in the bag and let off of the gas some. When you do that you put extra pressure on that “not so great” D and goalies that are unproven. Add to that what everyone has already stated about the play of Halak and you have the perfect recipe for disaster for the Caps. I for one gave Montreal NO chance of winning the series, man was I wrong.
He was apparently right about Pittsburgh as well.
Great D and Halak playing out of his mind is taking Montreal far. With Philly and Boston beating the crap out of each other, you have to like the Habs chances of making the finals.
Only to get slaughtered by Chicago or San Jose. The Cup comes back to the West!
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
"Turner, at midcourt...inside it, at the buzzer, GOT IT!!!!"
by Andrew Tolliver on May 13, 2010 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions
The insane goaltending of Halak has struck again, allowing the Habs to push forward. I don’t think that really has to do with one style or another – I think that has to do with striking lucky at the right time.
Unfortunately, there is something annoying about the Habs style: the trap/the suffocation of Crosby and Ovechkin.
I know, that was the point, but as a fan it’s terribly boring. The same style has helped Boston thus far, offering a totally passive style of hockey. Gill and Georges played brilliantly and completely turned the best players in hockey to mere warm bodies on the ice. I guess that style works, but it is terrible boring and I hate to watch.
I think the real problem from Pittsburgh is the total lack of competence on the wing. Sure, shutting off Crosby and Malkin is one thing (a big thing), but if there is no one else who can truly threaten to score, it only takes one shut-down per shift to win a series.
I think that was a big problem when we faced the Red Wings last year. Without anyone of note besides Nash (sorry rest of team), the Wings could just close him off. Getting another competent player on the top line would be excellent, leaving more freedom for Nash AND the other person. Shutting down one person at a line is far simpler than having to deal with a dual-scoring threat.

by 




















