Are the Jackets really going to leave Columbus?
Reports have been surfacing lately detailing the financial issues that are affecting the Blue Jackets. I have been waiting a while before commenting on this, as I am skeptical that this story isn't anything more than a bump in the road that has been overblown by the media. That said, it could potential be troubling for Columbus. With the recent troubles in Nashville, Florida and Atlanta, and moreso in Phoenix, the issue of ownership and financial loss are at the forefront of off-ice NHL discussion.
To put it in simple terms, here is the issue- the Jackets are reportedly losing approximately $12 million per season, largely due to the lease agreement the Jackets have with Nationwide Insurance, who own Nationwide Arena. Because the arena is privately financed, the Jackets aren't receiving certain revenues that most other teams recieve- these dollars are acquired via parking fees, partial luxury box revenue, and arena naming rights. The Jackets are also tasked with managing the arena year-round. That means they must manage the concerts and other events which use the arena. They are unable to focus solely on the Blue Jackets. The rent that the Jackets pay is apprximately $5 million per year. They are the primary permanent tenant in the arena, so that leaves the Jackets, and any concerts or shows which use the facility with the rent bill. Nationwide is one of the very few privately-owned arenas in the NHL. Most of the other NHL clubs have buldings which were funded with public dollars, which makes it easier for NHL clubs to use them as a home.
John H. McConnell was the man who brought the team to Columbus, and with his passing last season, his majority stake in the team was passed to his son, John P. McConnell. The Dispatch reports that he is willing to sell the franchise if the lease agreement can't be ratified, or another solution is put into play to help stop the bleeding. This doesn't necessarily mean that the team would be moved if sold, but it is a very real possibility. That said, the recent events in Phoenix show that the NHL is dead-set against relocating franchises. They will do whatever they can within their power to keep the team in Columbus, but if local investors can't be found, can the NHL purchase another franchise just to keep it in its current location? (The NHL currently owns and operates the Coyotes, purchasing the team essentially to prevent Jim Balsillie from buying the club and moving it to Hamilton, Ontario)
Changes in ownership happen relatively often, with local groups stepping up and purchasing organizations with the intent of keeping them in their current city. Nashville is a recent example, ditto for Pittsburgh. Discussing a sale of the team however is somewhat premature, as the issue at hand is the lease agreement. Stephen Buser, the Ohio State University professor who wrote the report detailing the Jackets' financial woes, offers up some ideas to help the issue with the lease. These ideas include applying taxes and fees to help offset the operating costs.
Jackets' president Mike Priest had this to say in a Canadian Press Article (Full link at top of page):
"Public partnership in arenas and stadiums has been a critical element to ensuring healthy, competitive sports franchises in markets across the country, including Cleveland and Cincinnati in Ohio, and our priority continues to be to secure long-term financial viability in this great city,"
The issues here are real, and troubling, but this isn't the first time that an NHL franchise has seen high operating losses. I'm confident that the lease agreement can be modified to suit the team, or another solution can be put into place. The Jackets have been great for the city of Columbus, boosting the local economy with the build-up of the Arena District. Businesses have flocked to the formerly barren part of town, and the Arena District itself has been a model for other such developments in cities around the United States. Using the Blue Jackets and their arena as the focal point of essentially a new neighbourhood, with restaurants, bars and other businesses has proven to be a financial boon to Columbus.
Chins up, Columbus- I feel safe that the issues at hand will be taken care of and the Jackets will remain a huge part of Columbus. As the team on the ice continues its upward trajectory, the team will become a true NHL heavyweight, and finally be a shining star on the NHL map, a star that beacons from Columbus, Ohio.
"I have full confidence that we have the support it takes in this town to find a solution,"- CBJ President Mike Priest (Columbus Dispatch Article)
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Support...
I’m not sure why this would be a surprise to anyone. Lamar Hunt said it would lose money, and is why he walked away from the Blue Jackets before they arrived. Private team owners and private venue owners just does not work. The Jackets will need to have Nationwide Arena under a public/private deal.
That said, the good people here in Columbus (Franklin county) would sooner agree to move OSU to Portsmouth before they would agree to any new tax. It wouldn’t matter at all for most people here to let a legitimate pro team walk away from the city. It also wouldn’t matter to them about the jobs that would be lost, or the influx of money it brings. They wouldn’t care that the Arena district would dry up and become what it was before the old Pen was torn down. It also wouldn’t matter to them about the good that the Blue Jackets Foundation has done for the city.
While they would never approve a tax for 3 years, they’ll most likely pay anyway through cigarettes & alcohol, or hotel rooms and car leasing.
It was a bad deal to begin with, but we have a home team to root for.
by Ran2112 on Nov 9, 2009 4:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Everyone else is doing it
Taxing the people to pay for a private industry is theft!! I love hockey, and I love the Jackets, but so far the people here have understood that it wrong to use taxes for this purpose. Just because all kinds of towns have done this and it has worked does not make it right. It gives the team ownership the go ahead to hold the town hostage when they want a new stadium or anything else. Remember the Cleveland Browns part 1? What I would love to see is a situation like The Green Bay Packers. Let the town invest in the business by selling stock in the team.
Regardless of what the team does for the town, through the Bluejackets foundation or anything else, we did just fine before we had a team and we would survive without one again if we had to.
Just to make clear I would be the first to shed a tear if the Jackets had to leave town, but public money should never be used for this purpose!!!!
by dms2262 on Nov 9, 2009 6:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Taxing the public is one option, but one of the recommendations in the report was to in fact to sell team stock. Taxes are one of the easiest solutions, but it isn’t the only option.
Follow me on Twitter folks!
http://twitter.com/mikeejmaclean
by Mike MacLean on Nov 9, 2009 7:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not an option.
Taxes should not even be considered as a solution is my point.
by dms2262 on Nov 9, 2009 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh I understand your point, and I know that a vast majority of the people in Columbus agree with you. Look at the past 15 years. That said, it hasn’t been ruled out-yet.
Follow me on Twitter folks!
http://twitter.com/mikeejmaclean
by Mike MacLean on Nov 9, 2009 9:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You can rule out any sales tax. Sin tax would go over more easily…hated, but would be swallowed. That is just for Nationwide Arena. I don’t think Mac would be that interested in letting the team go public. As written, he may be more likely to sell the team more so than his father was, but I don’t think any public offering for the team will come about.
Maybe we could talk to the new casino owners into becoming good friends with the neighbors. lol
by Ran2112 on Nov 10, 2009 3:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe we could talk to the new casino owners into becoming good friends with the neighbors.
My thoughts exactly. They’ll be a huge addition to the Arena District. So, why not?
Columbus til I die, Columbus til I die. I know I am, I swear I am, Columbus til I die!
by BLAZER_FAN_199 on Nov 10, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
all i got to say is...
it would be fitting that the team finally starts to click and become a formidable hockey club just to get sold/moved to somewhere else….I want MY, OUR JACKETS TO STAY…
everyone loves a winner, so maybe that is a saving grace for our club if they can continue to do well but I understand that it is much more then the Jackets themselves that is hurting the team…..this is something I don’t want to hear about….
Nash for 8 More, Baby!
by PhillyPhan85 on Nov 10, 2009 12:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
“this is something I don’t want to hear about….”
It’s something that has to be looked at, and addressed. The Jackets are in their 2nd year of not paying their rent due. Mr. Mac had to know going into signing the lease it was a bad deal. Maybe his thinking was it would resolve itself. Who knows. But he was a smart man, and had to know this was going to happen.
The Jackets need to somehow get the arena bought from Nationwide, or we will be in pretty sad shape.
by Ran2112 on Nov 10, 2009 3:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The bottom line. There is one.
It will take time before the CBJ’s are gone, however, unless there are substantial changes someday they will be gone. Losses like these cannot go on forever. In a meltdown era for America, and for Ohio, I found it interesting to read a few weeks ago that an area on the SW edge of Columbus is one of the most blighted property areas in America. To say that Columbus was OK before they arrived and will be after they leave may sound glib and smug. Take their “cascading washing of money” that currently adds tens of millions to our economy out of the arena district and watch what happens. I assure you it will not be “fine”.
I have seen taxes taken to build infastructure so developers could build a mall, or a housing development, or a factory. What is the difference here? Is it because its sports? It is not about sports. It is about jobs, property values, and the continued recovery of the inner city. If they leave the short north will have immediate and dramatic negative inter-reactive fallout. 30 million dollars of positive cash flow will just disappear.
The article was a lot of words. But it added nothing to understanding the truth about this problem. This is not just going to go away. I am sorry that the founders were so committed to bringing change to Columbus that they, he, allowed foolish contracts to be drawn up. However, the Jackets are here. The effect has been very positive and this needs fixed within one year or we all, fans, or those who could care less, will be very sorry when they play hockey in another state and that building fails and ends up empty.
by RonnieO on Nov 13, 2009 9:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 

























