Hockey's Future's take on the Jackets
Hockey's Future, one of the best sources for prospect news and coverage (not to mention their message board, which is easily the best NHL message board out there) has compiled their top-10 organizational rankings for prospects. The Jackets came in fourth. Here's what they had to say:
Strengths: Russian Nikita Filatov is a contender for the Calder Trophy this year and is considered one of the most offensively gifted players to be stepping into the NHL. Center Derick Brassard hopes his injury problems are behind him so that he can continue turning heads. A strong group of collegiate blueliners await their turn – Cody Goloubef in Wisconsin, Ohio State’s Will Weber and Notre Dame’s Teddy Ruth among them. John Moore chose the OHL instead of Colorado College and is off to a good start. Matt Calvert will be a key leader for the Brandon Wheat Kings as the host club for the 2010 Memorial Cup.
Weaknesses: The Blue Jackets will need to get a injection of youth into the system soon though, since many of their top prospects are nearing graduation. They are without a top prospect at the right wing position. Depth at center may also be a concern.
You can find the full article HERE
Interesting that they still consider Brassard a prospect by their standards. Had he not missed so many games to injury last season, he would likely have been graduated in HF terms. They make a mistake regarding Will Weber though- he does play college hockey in Ohio, but for Miami University, not Ohio State. Right wing, as they say, needs help. Here are a couple of players I like at the right wing position who could be a first round pick for the Jackets in June- Brett Connolly (Prince George Cougars, WHL); Stanislav Galiev (Indiana Ice, USHL); and Guillaume Asselin (Montreal Juniors, QMJHL).
Hockey's Future also took an in-depth look at the Jackets from a prospect perspective, here's a snippet:
There is no doubt that the Columbus Blue Jackets have a talent-laden prospect pool. They have two top prospects at forward in Derick Brassard and Nikita Filatov, a high-potential defenseman in John Moore, and two older, but solid goaltending prospects in Dan LaCosta and Kevin Lalande. But beyond them there is good depth as well.
The Blue Jackets are fairly deep at every position, but are without a top prospect at the right wing position. Depth at center may also be a concern.
It's a great article, giving some insight on some of the prospects in the Jackets stable. You can find the full article HERE
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree that it is a great article. I’ve long thought that HF has it a little wrong though with what they call a prospect. I also think the ratings are a little deceiving… I’d like to see HF evaluate each teams young players/prospects under the age of 24.
I guess it depends what you read into it. HF’s system measures the team with the best players not on their NHL roster… as opposed to which team has the brightest future. Personally I’m more interested in the brighter future and therefore include young NHL players. This would eliminate some of the eyebrows on these ranks. If Brassard isn’t counted, I don’t think we are a top 10 team in terms of prospects, if you took the players under 25 we might be the best.
I’d like to see them add this to their repertoire because I think it fits well.
The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Thanks for the kind words.
One note: Galiev actually plays for the Saint John Sea Dogs in the QMJHL this season.
HF’s prospect criteria gets a lot of talk, usually by fans of teams who feel they’ve either benefited or more often, have been short-changed by it. The goal, of course, is to measure every team with the same stick and be as inclusive as possible, but not to skew too much towards players who have made the jump. It’s always been our opinion that the NHL gets plenty of coverage from plenty of sources (and the rise of blogs since HF began attests to that) and so we’ve tried to carve our niche firmly in players who haven’t made the jump.
Brassard is, rightfully, an NHL player. There are a few players listed on the Organizational Rankings who are. But in the interest of taking any subjective factors out of it, we stick pretty steadfast to our criteria. In addition, this has been the same criteria that we’ve used for many years now and I think consistency is important. Obviously, a lot of work that we do is opinion (at least I like to think educated opinion), but having an objective baseline to work from helps both the writer and the reader.
As it stands, and this might be the cop out answer, anytime questions are raised about the criteria, the usual response is asking for someone to suggest something better. We’ve been using our current criteria for, I believe, upwards of 5 years now. We’ve never found anything better.
-Kevin Forbes
Hockey's Future
Thanks Kevin,
It’s great to hear it right from the horse’s mouth, so to speak.
As for Galiev, I can’t believe I missed that! I live in a QMJHL market, and like to think I keep good tabs on guys. Galiev is a guy I had on my radar last year in the USHL, it’s great that I can watch him when the Dogs are in town. Thanks for the head’s up!
Follow me on Twitter folks!
http://twitter.com/mikeejmaclean
Yeah I heard they got beat up. I’ haven’t been to a game all year to be honest. I don’t want to seem like a fairweather fan, but I just can’t get excited for the Moose.
Sounds like last night would have been a great game to go to, if for no other reason than to see Galiev.
Follow me on Twitter folks!
http://twitter.com/mikeejmaclean

by 
























