Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

Winning in Mud



Have you ever watched two tortoises fight?

This was a very plodding, trudging, grinding game if there ever was one. Unless you are a fan of attempted cycles and blocked passes, this one was a tough one to watch. The entire game seemed to be played in mud. On either end of the ice there was not much happening. Outside of the Nash-Huselius (Huselius's 20th post of the year), and Williams on a rush, there wasn't much Jacket offense tonight.

I'm not sure we saw a player at top speed with the puck the entire game.

Thank god for Raffi Torres. Say what you will about Raffi, but he has scored some clutch goals for us this year. Huselius made a beautiful pass on the first one. Vokoum would probably like to have the second one back. I was on his case when he was coming back from injury. I'll gladly eat my crow because I was excited about him when we picked him up.

To be honest this was the first game I've seen the Panthers this year. All year I've wondered how in the world with their lineup they've contended. I figured out the answer. They play defense and the East can't handle it. It is the same reason we have dominated the East. Thankfully we have more offensive players than Florida.

I liken games like this to basketball and half court offense. As a team we have a very hard time creating scoring chances from the half court set. Raffi scored on our best chance from the half court. We can grind, we can cycle, we can control the puck, but rarely are we able to create meaningful scoring chances when our opponent is set up in half court defense. To our credit we don't give up many of these goals either.

This was the first subpar game from Vermette tonight, but of course he caps it with an empty netter. He didn't play badly, he just seemed invisible. Umberger as well.

Our defense did a great job of controlling their players all night long. Outside of one breakdown by Commodore and Hejda, there were not many chances allowed. Recent whipping boy Klesla lead all players in ice time. Give the guy a chance to get back into the game.

Mancrush: It has to be Raffi tonight. Not just one clutch goal, but two. The game was won on his stick. This could have easily been a frustrating, lulling loss. He pulled out the two points and will give us that much more breathing room.

Whipping Boy: Half Court Offense. We have a hard time with it 5 on 5 AND the powerplay. We've got to be able to get some players open in scoring areas. We have to generate some shots through from the points. Otherwise we might as well roll 45 seconds off of the clock. This would be my challenge to our coaches. Improve our offense when the d is set up.

They say a mark of a good team is winning games when you are not your best and we have won a few lately when we did not have a our "B" game. This is a great sign.

By my projects we need FOUR MORE WINS to grab a playoff spot. We are 7.5 points up on most of the field from the outside looking in. With the win we move only 3 points behind the fading Blackhawks. The Canucks are starting a 6 game roadie. I'd crap my pants if we finished in 4th.

In the spirit of the NCAA Tournament, only the last 3 minutes matter.

Hit the comments.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The minute Raffi scored his second goal, I did my best Al Michaels impression to quite a few people.

I think Vermette and Umberger had 'OK' games, but the reason they looked a bit lackluster was Vokoun - he seemed to know how to take away the shot from both of them, including that unreal glove save in the middle of the third.

Raffi Torres is 100% a clutch player, and we are seeing him rise to the occasion.

I'm thinking about how Raffi and Peca are playing right now, and it reminds me a lot of how they looked watching the 2003 Oiler cup run. I get chills when I say that too loudly.

by BZArcher on Mar 21, 2009 10:58 PM EDT reply actions  

I can't remember: was this the first time Hitch put Vermette up with Juice and Nash?

by Anonymous on Mar 21, 2009 11:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Anon: Yes.

by BZArcher on Mar 21, 2009 11:40 PM EDT reply actions  

it seems odd that Hitch keeps fluctuating (outside of injuries) the lines, but it seems to work well as it keeps the other teams guessing...

by Barga on Mar 22, 2009 12:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Barga: I think it was plain and simple an attempt to get some offense clicking. We weren't scoring with the initial lines? Fine, let's see what happens if we shake it a little.

by BZArcher on Mar 22, 2009 1:54 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree. We were not generating anything around the next through the first two periods. I think Vermette popping in with Nash and Umberger was a product of the way the penalties flowed.

Huselius went out with Voracek the shift before and neither killed penalties.

by Clint Clark on Mar 22, 2009 8:12 AM EDT reply actions  

Oh, I agree, it was an attempt to get the lines clicking, and I, frankly, loved it. I think that Nash and Vermette together are a killer pair, and a winning combo.

by Barga on Mar 22, 2009 12:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Columbus Blue Jackets.

FanPosts

29 - 46 - 7

Won 2


Manager

Mikeheadshot_small Mike MacLean

Writers

Andy-newman_small Andy Newman

Headshot_small Matt Wagner

Gog_colum_750px_horiz_beer_small Dan P.

Shhslogo_small Lou Bordeaux